For tps27081a, some combinations of current and rise time gives current too strong for the switching time. Would the device be safe under them?
Hui
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
For tps27081a, some combinations of current and rise time gives current too strong for the switching time. Would the device be safe under them?
Hui
Hui,
The device application engineer will answer your question Monday US time.
Hello Hui,
The rise times in Table 2 were taken under light load conditions.
Additionally, the 9.5A and the 129ns specifications are taken under different conditions and will not necessarily happen at the same time.
Best,
Michael
Hui,
Yes, additional testing may be necessary.
As long as the device is used within the datasheets specified operating conditions, the device will operate properly. If the device is stressed beyond these conditions, then we cannot guarantee the proper operation of the device.
Best,
Michael
We have seen lots of MOSFETs like www.ti.com/.../csd16301q2.pdf with di/dt rating of 200A/us or larger. This is listed under "reverse recovery" testings. As this is an included parameter in the specification, does this means such TI device (like csd16301q2) can stand the 200A/us slope and the induced near-field / immediate vicinity EM field?