Team,
My customer has the following questions regarding the UCD9090.
There is a note in the UCD9090 datasheet:
I would like to further understand TI’s concerns with using the RESET_N line to power cycle the rails.
When I’ve used the PMBUS_CNTRL line to power cycle the rails, it worked nice, but I’ve got other design requirement’s where I want to reset the UCD9090 as well.
In the lab, using RESET_N to cycle the rails, I’ve noticed the following:
-
There is no sequencing off (The rails get disabled as soon as the UCD9090 goes into reset)
-
There is ~20ms delay after coming out of reset before the first rails sequences on.
If I can live with the two previously observed conditions, are there any other reasons why I cannot use the RESET_N line to power cycle the rails?
Regards,
Aaron
