Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQMTESTER
E2E community -
I am having an issue with a customer regarding initial (out-of-the-box) accuracy of the battery gas gauge.
I have created the Golden Image per the bqMTester user's guide, section 4, and have used it to program the pack using the Multi-Tester application. The customer has taken the pack, charged it to full, and then discharged it through their utilizing equipment. They get about a 5% difference between the 0% SoC point and the designed minimum operating voltage on initial operation. Is there any way to improve this initial number, or does the pack need to be cycled with the production cells in order to improve accuracy?
One thing I have just discovered is a mention in one of your app notes that an inaccurate learning cycle can occur if the pack is allowed to discharge to CUV cutoff instead of stopping the discharge at the design minimum voltage. My practice has been to charge to taper current cutoff (C/20), rest 2 hours, discharge to CUV, and allow to rest over night. Would this be causing the inaccuracy?
Also, is the charge and discharge rate critical to learning? I noted that the app note recommends charge at C/2 and discharge at C/5. Is this a hard-and-fast rule? The pack I have designed has an overcurrent shutdown that is below C/2. I have been both charging and discharging at a value between C/4 and C/5. In the initial test at the customer, they were discharging at approximately C/15. Would this affect the gas gauge accuracy?
Any help would be appreciated.
George Mortimer