This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMR16010: Absolute maximum rating for LMR16010 FB (feedback) pin

Part Number: LMR16010

We are using the LMR16010 in a circuit that provides closed-loop current control for a 0.5H, 60-ohm solenoid coil.

In this application, the LMR16010 GND pin is connected to -15V and its VIN is connected to +15V.  Signal THP is connected to the GND pin.  Signal RT_SYNC is connected to the GND pin through 133 Kohms.  The BOOT pin is connected to the SW pin through a 0.15 uF capacitor.  The SW pin is connected to (1) an LC filter and (2) a 100V zener diode clamp to the GND pin.

The FB pin is driven by an instrumentation amplifier that can drive between GND (-15V) and the positive supply (+15V).  The instrumentation amplifier is connected to the LMR16010 FB pin through a 10.5 Kohm resistor.  We have noted that this design configuration can violate the absolute maximum rating of the feedback pin because the LMR16010PDDA is rated for a difference of -0.3V to 7V above the GND pin.  In our application, since GND = -15V and FB can swing to 0V, we could potentially exceed the absolute maximum by 8V under certain start-up conditions.  As indicated above, we do limit the current into the FB pin through a 10.5 Kohms resistor that would ensure current into FB pin does not exceed 1 mA.

Is the FB pin sensitive to voltage (i.e. must never exceed the 7V) or can the limit be exceeded provided the current is limited?  We experienced the failure of about 3 LMR16010 devices out of an initial batch of 10 boards (3 LMR16010 per board) and are reviewing the design to identify root cause.

  • Hi, James,

    According to your description, seems the maximum possible voltage stress between FB-GND pin is 30V instead of 15V.

    Although the current which may flow into FB pin is limited, it's still possible the excessive voltage would result break down on dielectric material inside.

    For the 3 failure you observed, please provide more details on the failure symptom.

    After the failure, is the LMR16010 the only device been damaged?

    Comparing to the functional device, is there any obvious FB-GND impedance change?

    Is there any pin on the damaged device metered as short circuit to GND?

    Thanks.
  • We have taken some data in our lab (attached) and verified we are not exceeding the absolute maximum voltage at the FB pin.  Our design has 2 different power supplies that are capable of providing power to the LMR16010.  The first plot (Power on by PS1) shows the power-up sequence for that power supply.  There is a second plot (Power on by PS2) for the other supply.  A third plot shows the response at pin 5 when we command a full scale step output.

    • “Power On by PS1” = the IC was powered by Power supply 1.  The +15V was at level after -15V around 6ms.  The pin 5 was followed pin 7 very closed.

    • “Power On by PS2” = the IC was powered by Power supply 2.  The +15V was at level before -15V around 7ms.  The pin 5 was followed pin 7 very closed.

    • “Enable the IC” = The IC was commanded to provided 300mA.  There was a transient on pin 5 but the peak of this transient was around 1.5V.  Note: CH3 was set at AC mode.

     After looking at this data, we are unsure why the parts are failing.

    We will measure pin to ground impedance for the failed devices and I will post that data.

    Is there a way for us to return the failed devices for failure analysis?

    Thanks for your assistance.

  • Hi, James,

    You may find the contact information for FA request at www.ti.com/.../calltisupport.tsp

    Since I didn't see the schematic/waveforms in this post, would you mind leave your email in the post for me to contact you?

    Thanks.
  • Contact info is jnewell@moog.com