This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM53601-Q1: LM53601_Q1

Part Number: LM53601-Q1

I am evaluating the LM53601-Q1 fixed 3.3V part in an application which requires the part to work from 6V to 21V operational with a load of 280mA. From the data sheet I see that the recommended output filter  of  4.7uH and 20uF. Simulation in WEB BENCH indicates about the same values as well. The application circuit I am analyzing (actually two separate ideas) has two different configurations: 1) 10uH (1 amp rated) with 10uF; 2) 10uH (again 1 amp) with a split 10uF in parallel with a ferrite bead shunted by an additional 10uF capacitance. All of this is on a very small PCB so trace length is not a factor.

When simulating Design 2, I cannot include directly of course the ferrite bead so I use an equivalent of 22uF. In this case, @ 6V the simulation indicates that the phase margin is 31 degrees and this does not meet the "requirement" of a minimum phase margin of 35 degrees. Design 1 is even worse, the phase margin being very close to 16 degrees.

My question(s) are as follows: (Let me preface all of this: WEB BENCH is a nice convenient tool for sure, but I take all simulations with a grain of salt until I can measure something for real and confirm data)  How tolerant is this part to using a 10uH inductor? Where is the 35 degree minimum phase margin specified, or is this a recommendation based on general stability analysis of typical  current mode control SMPS? How seriously should the output filter values be taken?

  • The LM53601-Q1 is peak current mode controlled synchronous buck converter. With current mode control, the inductance value is not quite a factor in crossover and phase margin calculation. Cout is the main factor. Lower Cout should be the reason of lower phase margin. Adjust CFF could help.
    Smaller inductor is better for faster current slew rate at load transients. Large inductance gives smaller current ripple, which is good for smaller Vout ripple. But you don't want the ripple to be too small with current mode control, where control loop depends on sensed ripple.
    When you have a ferrite bead in between two capacitors, only the one closer to the converter can be counted as Cout. The one after the bead will not respond to transient fast enough, so will not contribute to loop response.