This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS63020: Feed forward ( phase lead ) capacitor when using regulators as a CC source

Part Number: TPS63020

Some DC/DC converter data sheets specify using Cff,  a feed-forward capacitor (aka, "phase lead capacitor") between the output and the feedback pin in order to improve transient response.     In some cases this technique uses a series R-C  between VOUT and FB to achieve the same function, but most often I've seen a single cap do the job.    Below,  I've taken a screenshot from TI's app note involving LDO's and feed-forward capacitors to illustrate this technique.

This feed forward capacitor technique is used in both LDO/linear  and switching regulators.    

In my applications, I am using both LDO's and switching regulators configured as constant-current sources, taking the the feedback signal developed from the [ current X resistance ] of a shunt monitor.  For example, to be generic:


My questions are:    (1) When using a regulator as a constant-current source by taking the feedback signal not from the voltage output, but from the [current X resistance] of a shunt monitor,   does this affect Cff's value or behavior?   (2)  Does Cff still perform its duty on transient response if the feedback signal is developed from a sensed current?    (3)  If the behavior regarding Cff is different between LDO, buck, boost, buck-boost regulators, how so does it differ between these topologies?  (4)  In constant-current configurations, is Cff still connected between VOUT and FB or is there an alternate connection?

  • Hi,

    I am working on this post, will get back to you as soon as I have the answer.
  • Hi,

    (1) When using a regulator as a constant-current source by taking the feedback signal not from the voltage output, but from the [current X resistance] of a shunt monitor, does this affect Cff's value or behavior?
    This would not affect the Cff's behavior, but the value.
    Considering the impedance characteristic of an LED, at the operating point, the impedance would be smaller compared to a pure resistive
    load, thus a bigger Cff is needed to see the effect.

    (2) Does Cff still perform its duty on transient response if the feedback signal is developed from a sensed current?
    Yes it does, provided than it is dimentioned accordingly

    (3) If the behavior regarding Cff is different between LDO, buck, boost, buck-boost regulators, how so does it differ between these topologies?
    In my opinion, the the Cff behavior remain the same regardless of the topology

    (4) In constant-current configurations, is Cff still connected between VOUT and FB or is there an alternate connection?
    I don't see any alternate connection