• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 65 subscribers
  • Views 233 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

No module for TPS55332 in 3.8 version of switcherpro

Roberto Radaelli
Prodigy 10 points

Hi...

i read in another post that some module are off from the switcherpro.

i think also the TPS55332, but i want to know when is come avaible.

thank's

Roberto

  • 0
    TI__Expert 3875 points

    Hi Daelliberto,

    The TPS55332 was intentionally disabled in SwitcherPro 3.8 due to some issues with the design equations. These problems existed in all prior versions of SwitcherPro (including SwitcherPro 3.7). The TPS55332 should not be used in any version of SwitcherPro. At this time, we do not have any plans to fix and re-release the TPS55332 in SwitcherPro. So, unfortunately, TPS55332 designs will need to be done with hand calculations using the datasheet equations or with the aid of an application engineer.

    We are extremely sorry about any inconvenience or schedule delay this problem maybe creating for you.

    Sorry,
    Michael

    Michael Krasnicki
    Analog eLab
    Texas Instruments

  • 0 in reply to Michael Krasnicki
    TI__Guru 71526 points

    Michael,

    I saw a reference to an alternative tool (Excel?) to use with the TPS55332 to calculate loop values, is that correct?  And if so, where can I get a copy, nothing on the PF page.

    -Leonard

     

  • 0 in reply to LeonardEllis
    TI__Expert 3875 points

    Hi All,

    I moved this post to this forum in the hope that someone here can provide Leonard with an Excel spreadsheet tool for the TPS55332. eLab does not have one.

    Thanks,
    Michael

  • 0 in reply to Michael Krasnicki
    TI__Guru 71526 points

    I hope someone has some type of software; otherwise, we lose to LTC again becuase they DO have the tools to help design!