This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TL494: TL494- DC-DC converter -metal core constant current 200W module

Part Number: TL494

Hi 

I am using a typical Chinese  DC-DC converter (constant current) 250W assembled on a metal core laminate  to drive some string leds.

The  configuration is : input : 12 VDC  - 2,5A   - Output  25V- 1,2A - total  30W.  I firstly used 10 samples to submit 2 month test and they worked well.

Now I have a customer order of 1000 pcs and ordered the dc-dc converters  direct from china. The module is based on TL 494  with 2 tripots for output current and voltage adjust. 

When I started testing the product, I noticed  all the batch is producing a peak of current when I turn on the PS. Such peak of current , when adjusted for 12V input,  occurs for around  0,5 seconds during startupand the system returns to the voltage and current previously adjusted. If i reduce the input voltage to less than 11VDC, the peak occurs but the system does not return to adjusted  values, As result, the pcb increses the temperature and will fattaly burn the module. 

I replaced the TL 494 bey new ones and notices the modules became muc,much more stable, but I still notice a little peak of current in voltages lower than 12V. In this case , it is only a start up peak and the circuit starts working. I claerly noticed there is something wrong with the original TL494 that came with the batch. Has anyone experienced such problem already? Is it the TL494 the responsible for such peak , or could be a deffective capacitor of the typical application?

  • Image result for dc-dc 250W constant current convert

    This is the moduel I am referring to. Does nyone have the electric diagram of it?

  • This is the chinese module I am referring to . Does anyone have the electric diagram available?
  • Hello Mario,
    Do you mean that the set current is higher than expected and that it corrects itself after 0.5 seconds ?
    It sounds like something in the circuit is not accurately sensing the current and takes time to correct itself.
    This is unlikely to be the TL494.
    It may be that there is a bad solder joint on the current sense circuit or some other mechanical issue with the power supply.
    I suggest you visually inspect the pcb and reflow the solder wherever you see poor workmanship.
    Have you contacted your supplier of the power supply and asked for their suggestions ?

    Regards
    John
  • When i start up the module, there is an undesireble peak of current that takes 0,5 second to corect itself. However when I reduce 1-2 Volts of the input voltage and start up the module again, the circuit cannot correct itself and the current stays in the maximal value , compromising the module. As I do not have the diagram available, the first thing I did was re-soldering all components. Unfortunately it did not produce any effect. I only was succesfull when replaced the TL494. But again, I cannot say it is the TL494 the responsible for the problem.
  • Hi John
    I just re-soldered all component of the module, but it did not work. then I replaced the TL494(without extension) by a TL494C and it worked back. another point to be considered: I tested 50 modules. 100% presented the same behavior.(start up current peak is present). the difference is that the majoriry self correct themselves, but some not and the current grow up to the sky...any light at the end of the tunnel?
  • Hi Mario,
    If the part is made by TI marked either TL494C (a D or N package) or TL494 (an NS or PW package)
    But a TL494C part will not fit on a TL494 pad.
    You can check the packaging detail on the datasheet:
    www.ti.com/.../tl494.pdf

    The TL494 is one of the very first PWM controllers and there are many manufacturers of the "TL494".
    I think the parts on your boards are not TI parts but are either some other manufacturers or a counterfeit.
    The replacements parts are TI but the parts on the board are suspect.
    Regards
    John
  • Hi John

    Both are package soic 16. Despite the operation temperature I did not see any difference. Why did you say TL494C part will not fit on a TL494 pad. In practice, all modules of this manufacturer came with TL494 and in all modules there is a same behavior: peak of current when stat up the module. I purchased two modules of different manufacturer . Both came with TL494 C and both worked. I replaced the tl494 by a tl494c in the module with strange bahavior, and it started working.

    please see the pictures below.  TL494C works, TL494, which came with the module doesnot work. Perhaps the TL 494 can be conterfeit as you mentioned .

  • Hi John

    Sorry to insist in asking you support. I ordered new TL494-C and replaced all from the 600 pcs I bought . Most of them are working properly, but I still have this peak of current when startup the module. I noticed a better behavior , howeverÇ

    1- some modules still present the peak of current ,,but 100% return to the adjusted numbers

    2- the module specs are shown below, the moduel was designed to work from 10VDC input on, but this peak occurs around 11,5VDC input.

    Unfortunately I do not have the electric diagram to make a better analysis, so if anyone have it and could make it available, I would be thankfull.

    Module name: 250W constant current module

    【Module Properties】: Non-isolated boost module (BOOST)

    【Input Voltage】: DC8.5V-48V

    【Input current】: 10A (MAX) More than 8A Please strengthen the heat dissipation

    [Static working current]: 10mA (12V to 20V, the higher the output voltage static current will increase)

    【Output Voltage】: 10-50V continuously adjustable

    12-80V fixed output (for bulk customers)

    【Output current】: 10A MAX more than 6A Please strengthen the heat dissipation (with the input and output pressure, the greater the pressure difference, the smaller the output current)

    【Constant current range】: 0.2-8A

    【Output Power】: = input voltage * 10A, such as: input 12V * 5A = 60W, input 24V * 5A = 120W,

    Input 36V * 5A = 180W, input 48V * 5A = 240W,

    For more power, you can use two modules in parallel, such as the output to 10A, you can use two modules in parallel,

    Turn the current of each module to 5A.

    【Operating temperature】: -40 ~ + 85 ℃ (Please strengthen

    the heat when the ambient temperature is too high)

    【Working frequency】: 150KHz

    【 Conversion efficiency 】 : 96% high (efficiency and input, output voltage, current, pressure-related)

    Over current protection: Yes (input over 13A, automatically reduce the output voltage, a range of errors.)

    【Input reverse connection protection】: Yes, (less than 5A, if

    you need more reverse current, please input string into the diode)

    [Installation]: 4 3mm screw holes

    【Wiring】: wiring output

    【Module Size】: Length 70mm Width 36mm Height 13mm

    【Single module】: 50 grams

  • Hi Mario,
    The reason I think the parts are suspect is because the units came with a part marked TL494 which if a TI part would be an SO16 package (NS drawing in TI datasheet and part width of 7.8mm)
    You fitted a part marked TL494C which is an SOIC16 package (D drawing in the TI datasheet and 6mm wide)
    If both parts are genuine then one should be much narrower than the other.

    Sorry but this is all I can suggest.
    Regards
    John
  • Hi John

    I finaly decided to get the electric diagram by using reengineering way. I firstly removed the layer from the aluminium  and made a negative of the layout. As result i could re-draw the circuit. I measured the capacitor values and the diagram was finaly in hands. Analysing it and the documentation you recomended , I modified the soft start circuit, changing c10 to 10UF and R8 to 100k. The startup is very slow(around 0,5s) and the peak doesnot hapen anymore . As I am  using the module as source to led strings, I do not see any problem if the start up occurs  slowly. Do you see problem if I configura the soft start to around 0,5s instead the recomended 50-100 cycles of clock:? If not , my problem is solved. Please see the diagram below:

  • just for the people who are interested in having such diagram , follows the bom:
    Location Value Case
    C1 220uF 50V
    C2 220uF 50V
    C3 1uF
    C4 220uF 50V
    C5 220uF 50V
    C6 1uF
    C7 1uF
    C8 100nF
    C9 100nF
    C10 1uF(recommended to increase it to improve soft start)
    C11 Not Applicable
    C12 100nF
    C13 1nF
    C14 100nF
    C15 100nF
    C16 100nF
    C17 1nF
    D1 SS54
    D2 MBR20100CS
    G1 NCE6075
    L1 47uH
    Q1 D884
    Q2 Y1
    Q3 Y2
    R1 Not Applicable
    R2 4K3
    R3 15K
    R4 Not Applicable
    R5 1K5
    R6 10K
    R7 10K
    R8 10K (recommended to increase it to improve soft start)
    R9 10K
    R10 22R
    R11 1K
    R12 4R7
    R13 240K
    R14 Not Applicable
    R15 22R
    R16 10K
    R17 1K
    R18 0R
    R19 0R01
    RV1 10K
    RV2 5K
    U1 TL494C
    ZD1 WL