This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMG5200: Parallel LMG5200's stability

Part Number: LMG5200

Dear Team,

Do you have any successful case to parallel LMG5200?

My customer is wondering parallel two LMG5200 might influence the stability.

Base on my searching E2E:

I am not sure to recommend customer parallel the component or not.

Any comments will be appreciate.

Best Regards

Kevin

  • Hello Kevin,

    Thanks for your inquiry. As Alberto says, there are some challenges to parallel LMG5200, but it does not mean it is 100% not feasible. 

    1. For deadtime, you run the risk of cross conduction between High side FET of one LMG5200 and the Low-side FET of another LMG5200. Therefore, please have the dead time setup larger than the case when switching one device. 

    2.Even if the DT is large enough, the variation between parts will cause one of the LMG5200 to switch first. This device will dissipate all the cumulative Coss losses of all the other FETs that are connected to this node. Two solution: 1) to mitigate this is to split the inductor between the two LMG5200, effectively making this a multi-phase converter; 2) smaller inductors can be used to split the phases,and a single larger one to provide the DC filtering.

    Hope this helps. 

    Thanks and regards,

    Lixing

  • Dear Lixing,

    Thanks for the reply, if I have further questions will let you know.

    Best Regards
    Kevin