Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC28951-Q1,
In open loop condition, compensation pin injects about 5V, so will get the IC’s full duty, in this case, can we still use ‘’cycle by cycle current limit’’ this function?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In open loop condition, compensation pin injects about 5V, so will get the IC’s full duty, in this case, can we still use ‘’cycle by cycle current limit’’ this function?
Hello Paul
Yes you can. Even if the controller is operated closed loop - when the CS pin reaches the cycle-by-cycle current limit point the output voltage will drop and the comp pin will saturate high - exactly as it is doing in your open loop test setup.
Certainly use the UCC28950 for initial testing, if you intend that your application will have UCC28950 running at DMAX all the time and the cycle-by-cyle current limit is for protection then I would suggest you consider using the UCC28951-Q1 instead. The two devices are almost identical except that the UCC28951-Q1 works better at Dmax in current limit. http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slua853/slua853.pdf
Regards
Colin
Hello Paul
The UCC28951-Q1 eliminates the behaviour described in the earlier post at http://e2e.ti.com/support/power_management/isolated_controllers/f/188/t/292928
You are correct, if you use the UCC28950 in VCM then the cycle-by-cycle protection will trigger once the CS pin reaches 2V irrespective of the operating duty cycle.
Regards
Colin