This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TL494: Trouble with TL494 gate drive

Part Number: TL494

 All,

I am working on getting a small LCD inverter going.  It uses a (TI) TL494C into a full bridge and a couple of 09N05 power transistors to a step up transformer. This is the sort of unit that would go into a tv or laptop to power the backlight.   All I want to get out of it is a reliable HV power supply.  I see 12V on the VCC, 5V on the regulated power supply, and a clean 3.8V sawtooth wave on pin 5.  The circuit is set up to output on the output driver emitters thus the collectors are tied to VCC.  However, there is no output whatsoever on pins 9 or 10 and thus no voltage produced from that point on.  I am convinced the board is undamaged and working as an identical one does the same thing.   Is there something on the TL494 that needs some sort of bias or external voltage applied to make it work.  Alternatively is there an inhibit function that would suspend gate drive output unless some bias were applied. My experience with this device is that once connected it just runs.

Thanks

Tom

  • Hi Tom,

    There is a DTC pin 4 on the device. With 0V on this pin you will get a max duty cycle on the output. And with about DTC = 3.3V you will get no output pulses.
    This is sometimes used to set the max duty cycle. You should check the voltage on DTC. It should be less than 3.3 or open circuit.

    You should also check the output voltage of the error amplifiers pin 3.
    If the voltage on pin 3 is greater than the voltage on pin 5 (the sawtooth) then there will be no output pulses. Check that V(pin3) is less than about 3.3V

    Hope this helps

    Regards

    John

  • All,

    I just checked pin 4 and it shows 17mV.  So no problem there.  Different story on pin 3.  The sawtooth wave is 3.26v, exactly as expected.  But the error amplifier output on pin 3 is 4.8v which clearly exceeds.  The original design of the inverter has an "adjustment" lead that goes through 100k to pin 1.  No idea what sort of voltage is expected there but I think it is to adjust the output and with it the display brightness.  Grounded or tied to VCC makes no difference in the 4.8v level and of course no output.  Tying that ADJ lead to an independent 6v supply (positive ground) raises the voltage on pin 3 to 5.6, so we are going in the wrong direction there.  Switching it to a negative ground or referencing to VCC does nothing. There is also an "N/L" lead that seems to want to be tied to VCC for any power at all to be sent to the TL494; whether that is an intended connection or not we are looking at.  I should add that for a brief moment in all this connection exercise the pin 3 voltage momentarily dropped to 2.6v which kicked everything into operation and I read over 400VAC on the output.  But it was a brief event.

  • A little additional information:  The "N/L" connection as we suspected appears to be a simple enable connection.  About 1.5V on that line snaps all the voltages right up to full VCC.  And it doesn't seem to make a lot of difference whether that is tied to full VCC, or the lesser amount.  When I put a scope on either of the TL494's emitter outputs to the bridge, on power up, there is about one second of full output, then it goes to right back to zero.  So that explains the brief voltage excursion.  After that brief moment something in the error circuitry kicks in and shuts it down so once powered up nothing seems to allow the chip to restart operation.  Nothing seem to drop the 4.8v I am reading on pin 3 that is stopping things.

  • Rather inglorious end to this exercise.  I could not do anything to the '494 to make the pin 3 voltage less than the sawtooth amplitude, so no output.  No idea how they wired it or what sort of voltage could be ever be attached to pin 1 to drop the error amplifier voltage.  So I attached a 10k pot to pin 3 and ground and just dialed it down to about 300 ohms and sure enough the voltage finally dropped.  And with that the pulse output came back on- pulse width varying smoothly with the pot- and I was reading about 600 volts AC across the transformer secondary.  Kind of a sloppy solution, but it was working until there came a puff of smoke and blown fuse- no more voltage.  So it looks like pin 1 does something after all and pin 3 doesn't like being grounded externally as a solution.

    Thanks to all who have read this.  Time for a new design.

  • Hello Tom,

    I will mark this thread as closed as per your conclusion.

    It is very difficult to troubleshoot a circuit without a schematic.

    Regards

    John