This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ34Z100-G1: Inconsistent SOC readings

Part Number: BQ34Z100-G1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: GPCCHEM

We have been developing a prototype system and have been struggling with the SOC readings on our BQ34Z100-G1.

It is difficult to see the value add of this chip and we are thinking that perhaps it was not a good choice for our application.

We are working with 3 lead acid batteries in series.  The batteries are meant to operate as a UPS.  When we lose power, they kick in.

We use the fuel gauge chip to check the health and welfare of the batteries.  If the SOC is too low, we shut down the system.

The SOC readings from the fuel gauge chip are very flakey.  Starting with a fully charged battery, we  see the SOC number @100%.

We then run the system off of battery for a period of time.

The SOC slowly decreases  as we would expect.

When it gets about 90% SOC we power off and then power back on (sending a reset to the fuel gauge).  We now read  back an SOC of  either 0% or 100%

In a separate experiment we do the same thing - battery At 90% and we send a reset.  It will now read 100%

I would expect a more accurate SOC.  Where did we go wrong?

Thanks!

  • Hi Roger,

    1) To determine the battery chemID, did you use the GPCCHEM tool? If so, how close was the match?
    2) After the chemID has been programmed, did you run a learning cycle? What are the values of the R_a0 and R_a0x Flags in your gg.csv file?

    Using the proper chemID is the basis of good impedance track gauging. If the cell has not been matched with a chemID using the GPCCHEM tool, please use the tool to determine the proper chemID. If the match is/was poor we can characterize the cell in Dallas.

    Sincerely,
    Bryan Kahler