Dear Team,
What is the reason make TPS563208(75%) can achieve a higher duty cycle than TPS563219(65%)?
Best Regards
Kevin
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear Team,
What is the reason make TPS563208(75%) can achieve a higher duty cycle than TPS563219(65%)?
Best Regards
Kevin
hi Kevin,
The duty cycle limitation comes from d-cap2 modulator limitation.
TPS563208 released to market later than TPS563219, designer optimized d-cap2 modulator and extend the Duty cycle limitation, from 65% increased to 75%.