Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62743, BQ25570
Hi experts. I'm looking at the bq25504 for an application and have some questions.
The target application will be using a very low power PV as input (MPPV ~1.5V, ~45uW), a supercap connected to VBAT for storage (5V, ~0.22F), and a load that requires an average of ~2uA@2.0V.
Looking at the datasheet, it seems that any positive voltage differential between VSTOR and VBAT (above the NFET body diode drop) will always flow to VBAT. As such, to get out of cold start mode, not only does CSTOR need to be charged above VSTOR_CHGEN, but the supercap on VBAT does also.
Our application is portable and it's likely that the supercap will become fully discharged somewhat regularly.
Given the much better efficiency of the main boost charger (plus MPPT tracking rather than the PV cell being clamped to VIN_CS) vs cold start mode, it would seem to be far better for the ultracap to remain disconnected until CSTOR reaches VSTOR_CHGEN plus some margin, and only then be connected (and disconnected once CSTOR falls to VSTOR_CHGEN). This would allow the supercap to be charged from 0V to VSTOR_CHGEN in main boost mode instead of cold start mode, which is likely to be tens of times quicker.
Are my assumptions here valid? If so, could this be achieved by settings the VBAT_OK_PROG to say 2.2V (i.e. VSTOR_CHGEN + 0.2-0.4V) and using the VBAT_OK output to close a separate FET that connects the supercap to VBAT? In this way:
- With the supercap and CSTORE at 0V and the PV cell in sunlight, the device enters cold start mode and charges CSTORE (supercap disconnected)
- V/CSTORE hits ~1.8V and the device switches to main boost mode with MPPT
1 - V/CSTORE hits 2.2V + VBAT_OK_HYST, VBAT_OK goes high and the supercap is connected to VBAT
2 - CSTORE discharges into the supercap
3 - V/CSTORE falls to VBAT_UV, VBAT_OK goes low, the supercap is disconnected and CSTORE starts charging again (with the device remaining in main boost mode) and back to 1.
The load would be driven directly from the supercap via a suitable buck converter like the TPS62743.
Does this design make sense?