This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ34110: Inconsistency with BQ34Z100-G1 design

Part Number: BQ34110
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ34Z100-G1

Hello there,

I have noticed a slight inconsistency between the reference designs of BQ34110 and BQ34Z100-G1. Here is the one for BQ34Z100-G1 (SLUSBZ5B –JANUARY 2015–REVISED JULY 2016):

Notice where is the common ground for the U2 and U3 chips. Now the reference design for BQ34110 (SLUSCI1B –AUGUST 2016–REVISED NOVEMBER 2016):

The common ground is referenced to PACK- line, not BAT- line, like for the BQ34Z100-G1.

Correct me if I am wrong but this is how I understand the difference:

  1. For the first schematics, the BQ34Z100-G1 is unable to measure the current that this circuit is drawing, since its bypassing the shunt resistor.
  2. The logical levels on the I2C line with the master devices will be offset by the voltage drop on the shunt resistor.

------------------

  1. For the second schematics, the device can measure the current that this circuit is drawing, since it doesn't bypass the shunt resistor.
  2. The logical levels for I2C between this slave and the master are correct.

If what I have written is correct, where does the difference in designs come from? Is there something else I don't see here?

PS: What is NT1 (Net tie)? Is it just a way to trick Altium into connecting 2 different nets together without using an actual 0R resistor? How does this component look on the PCB? Is it this one?

I would appreciate all help.