Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQSTUDIO, BQ76920, , BQ78350
I got a golden cycling done and generated golden file for one of my bq76920+bq78350-r1 project, and at that time, I was using bqStudio 1.3.54.1, and chosen Chem ID 2064 (INR18650NH1 3.2Ah) for the cell 2155 Chem ID (INR18650F1L 3.35Ah). It is because I didn’t see CHEM ID 2155 in bqStudio 1.3.54.1.
Right now, my customer asked me:
I think the Chem ID database in bqStudio needs updated. Our database shows the INR18650F1L cell…..see attached. Please advise if it is acceptable to keep the Chem ID as 2064 (INR18650NH1 3.2Ah) without having any negative impact on pack performance or if all boards need updated with the 2155 Chem ID (INR18650F1L 3.35Ah) since it is available in the Chem ID database?
Please let me know whether there is any negative impact on pack performance? Or another way to say: can we use the finished golden file which based on Chem ID2064 without having any negative impact on pack performance or I’d better program with 2155 Chem ID and redo golden cycling and generate new golden file?
Please advise.
Thank you very much!
Joy