Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ24725A,
I have the BQ24725AEVM-710 and custom circuit board with the BQ24725A. On both circuits I am able to communicate to them via I2C, set and read the charge options, charge current, charge voltage, and input current. I am testing the charge current capability and want to verify that it can provide up to 8A at any point within the specified voltage range for a 1S battery. To determine and verify the charge current maximum I have the proxy for the battery cell as a programmable load that is able to sink up to 20A.
Test Setup:
- Attach power supply to charger input and programmable load to Pack + and Pack -
- Power up the charger board and set the voltage and current limits.
- Charger Option 0x12 is set to 0x9932
- Increase the programmable load current in 0.010A or 0.100A increments
Other Notes:
- Ilim on the BQ24725AEVM-710 is 0.75V therefore having an external limit of ~4A and Ilim on the custom board with BQ24725A is >1.6V therefore having the external limit disabled.
- No load is connected to Vsys, therefore all the input current can be sent to the battery without limiting
Results:
In both cases as the current is increased the voltage across Pack + and Pack - decreases (as would be expected because the internal circuitry probably just changes resistance). When the current on the programmable load gets to ~1.3A on the BQ24725AEVM-710 it appears the charger stops and voltage drops to 0V. The same concept is true with my BQ24725A custom board which gets to ~2.13A before this occurs.
Questions:
- What could be causing the charger to cutoff before the maximum defined/rated 8A?
- Could it be with the test setup?
- The programmable load acts like a resistor where an increase in current results in a decrease in voltage. Whereas, a battery would have different characteristics (i.e. initial increase in current would increase voltage and a following decrease in current would maintain voltage).
- If so, what is the best way to test the ability to achieve 8A without a test battery rated at that range?
- Could there be a protection setting that could be disabled?