Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC28780, LMG3410R070
Ulrich
What I observe on the EVM ( I got it delivered today) is that they used 3x .33 uF with 2.2M bleeder.
I have not run the calc yet, but why 3x .33uF?
calculations I did on my needs force me to accept "dc derating to 40%" but why so when there is no DC across it?
#2 issue is that it resonates - so one has to assume current will be bipolar during its on time. Then a lot of dielectrics will not be acceptable here.
# if one uses logical extrema here, I would select an NPO that can handle the current during resonance with an estimation of the voltage across it( from Iclmp*Zr>> sqrt(L/C)?)
If leakage is , say, 3 uH, with .33 uF, Z is sqrt(3/.3) hardly more than 3V
Why 250V rating?
Is it because secondary side resonance is a different beast due to Nps?
This is crucial for super compact density- knowing what voltage Cclmp will ever be subjected to.
Does it ever have any dc voltage?
I would like to hear your side of the reasons.
thnx
r