This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

WEBENCH® Tools/TPS55340: Design from WorkBench doesn not work for us..

Part Number: TPS55340

Tool/software: WEBENCH® Design Tools

Hi,

We were using the WebBench to design our boost using the TPS55340. Although we were following the WorkBench design we are experiencing repeat part burnout.

We have stied using the part with load and without any load.

We are attaching the output from the workBench and our design.

Any Ideas?

Thanks

Amir7853.Boost.pdfTPS55340.pdf

 

  • Dear Sir,

    Please add a ceramic cap before the 30ohm RES. Or there will be stability issue. The added C can be around 4.7-10uF/50V.

  • Dear Helen

    Tank you for your reply.

    Adding the capacitor did help but it did not resolve our issues.

    Let me explain what we see:

    First, we have created a simulation board that includes all parts from Q1 to the right (on the attached 7853.Boost.PDF).

    Supplying 6V to L1, using 2200 uF instead of 4700uf as C4.

    Enable we are supplying 3.3 VDC.

    We are measuring the Voltage on C4 and monitoring it also using a scope.

    We did add 10uF ceramic capacitor between leg 3 of D1 and the ground.

    Our problems:

    1. The performance of the boost is not constant.

    1.1 At times when we give enable to leg 3 the voltage goes up only to 6.5 or 7 V and stopes (we expect it to ramp up to 18.4 V).

    1.2 At times it ramps up slowly

    1.3 At times it ramps up fast but does not stop at 20 V we saw it ramps to 25V and we stopped the enable to protect the circuit.

    1.4 At times we give it enable and nothing happens.

    2. we have few questions:

    2.1 Leg #5 sync do we need to connect it to the ground or it should be left unconnected (we are not using external clock).

    2.2 Leg #4 SS what is the relationship between the capacitance to the ground and the parts charge speed?

    After writing the above we have decided to try using 6V as enable. We have started to see a much more stable operation of the device.

    The only problem we see is that the voltage over shuts to 25V when according to the calculation it should get to 18.41 V.

    Appreciate your quick response

    Amir

  • Dear Sir,

    It seems the circuit is not stable. Could you please send your layout to us?