Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ76940, BQ78350, , GPCCEDV
Hi,
I wanted to know what is the accuracy of SOC estimation done by bq78350 and bq76940 ?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
I wanted to know what is the accuracy of SOC estimation done by bq78350 and bq76940 ?
Hi Ansul,
SOC accuracy for a CEDV battery gauge depends on how well you characterize your battery to tune the CEDV parameters and whether your battery will periodically discharge to 7%. Accuracy of 2-3% is very common for many applications. Some other TI battery gauges use the Impedance Track algorithm which has the potential for better accuracy (~1%). However, I have seen users achieve 1% accuracy with CEDV gauges with enough iterative tuning.
For more information about setting up the BQ78350-R1 gauging parameters, see this app note: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slua924/slua924.pdf
Best regards,
Matt
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the message.
Do you have any example or document on how to characterize the battery to tube CEDV parameters.
I have the Li-ion cell datasheet.
Hi Ansul,
The app note I pointed to before references the GPCCEDV tool. The instructions for this tool are here: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sluub45b/sluub45b.pdf
Basically, you need to collect 6 discharge logs for your battery (2 different loads, 3 different temperatures). This will generate CEDV parameters to ensure accuracy over different load and temperature conditions.
Best regards,
Matt
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the response.
Can I calculate CEDV coefficients my self by using the tool or I need to send the data to TI?
Is CAS number of the cell also required (Chemical Abstracts Service) ?
Ansul,
Yes, you can calculate the CEDV coefficients yourself using the GPCCEDV online tool. Use the instructions in the Gas Gauging section of this app note (http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slua924/slua924.pdf) and the GPCCEDV tool instructions: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sluub45b/sluub45b.pdf
Number of cells is one of the required inputs for the GPCCEDV tool.
I think there must be some confusion - Chemical Abstracts Service is not part of setting up this gauge. Are you thinking of the ChemID? TI has a ChemID database that contains a large number of batteries that have been characterized in TI's battery characterization lab. The app note shows how to select the ChemID for your battery. The BQ78350-R1 only uses the ChemID when it powers up or comes out of Shutdown to do an initial capacity estimation, but it is not used during normal operation.
Regards,
Matt