This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

UCC28630: Safety in event of a secondary short

Part Number: UCC28630

Hello,

I have a question about a safety related issue in an offline flyback converter, I plan to use the UCC28630. 

I am evaluating cases with a singular component failure that may expose a user to dangerous voltage levels at the output of a flyback converter with 24 V output voltage and wide range mains input. In case the secondary diode fails and shorts, the mains voltage divided by -Np/Ns of the transformer is applied on the output pins of the converter during the conduction phase of the primary FET. I want to make this safe by putting a second diode that has the cathode at the same place as the rectifier diode and the anode at the "bottom" secondary transformer winding. This diode would get forward biased in above mentioned failure case and activate a fuse which is in parallel with the rectifier diode.

Is this a valid approach, or does the UCC28630 already protect the output from such failures? Similar ICs from e.g. ON (FSQ0565) specifically have protections for these cases (in ON's case: Abnormal Over-Current Protection), but I couldn't read from the UCC28630's datasheet if it features something similar.

Thanks and regards

Alex

  • Hello Alex,

    Thank you for your interest in the UCC28630 flyback controller.

    I understand your concern with the case of a shorted output rectifier diode.  In such a case, the output capacitor would rapidly discharge through the shorted diode and secondary winding.  If the primary MOSFET were to turn on during this discharge moment, it would experience a very high peak drain current until the current sense (CS) loop can turn it off again.  If the output cap was already discharged by the time the primary side turned on, it would impress a 0-V shorted condition across the secondary winding, reflected to the primary.  In either case, the rise of primary current will be limited by the leakage inductance of the transformer, the bulk voltage applied to the primary, and amount of time it is applied.  This is very similar to a shorted-output condition except that the diode impedance will not be in series.

    In the UCC28630, the CS loop (Figure 32, page 35 of datasheet) has a leading-edge-blanking (LEB) interval of 100ns (pg 34), a propagation to output delay of 100ns (tPROP(gate), pg 52), and the turn-off delay of the MOSFET itself after Vgs goes low.  The MOSFET will need to sustain the peak current (Ipk = (Vbulk/Lm)*(tLEB+tPROP+tFET)) cycle by cycle until the VDD voltage decays below the UVLO shutdown threshold of 8V.  After that, the controller will attempt to restart periodically with three exploratory gate pulses (through VDD-UVLO cycling) but fail each time as long as the shorted condition exists.

    It’s a good idea to put a second diode after the main rectifier will help to reduce stress on the output capacitor from the reverse voltage which would attempted to be impressed across it during the main FET on-time.  A large cap may be able to sustain the brief reverse pulses indefinitely, but a small cap may not without the anti-parallel diode.

    A fuse in parallel with the secondary rectifier would simply be a short circuit itself, and then blow open after a few pulses.  Rather a fuse in series with the output diode would open only on excessive current.  However, the fuse would need to not blow under normal rms loading and any nuisance overloads, but is expected to blow in the shorted diode condition.  Depending on leakage impedances, these may be mutually exclusive.  Depending on circumstances you may or may not be able to find a single fuse that will blow when you want it to and not blow when you don’t want it to.  Plus it will increase the total leakage inductance all the time that such protection is not needed.

    A suitably rated primary MOSFET should be able to survive the shorted diode condition since it is virtually the same as a shorted output condition, which is a standard test for power supplies.   An anti-parallel diode across the output cap may be useful if that cap needs protection from reverse voltage/current pulses.  

    Regards,
    Ulrich

  • Hello Ulrich,

    you really understood my question, thanks a lot for your answer. I understand your explanation as to what happens in the circuit with a shorted rectifier diode.

    My main concern is the reverse voltage that would be impressed across the secondary winding in the primary MOSFET on-time. In my application, this voltage value exceeds the maximum allowable voltage defined by safety standards and be potentially dangerous for users. Did I understand correctly, that when I use a diode across the output capacitor, it would be enough to ensure safe voltage levels? Of course, the diode must be dimensioned so that it's able to withstand the current pulses caused by the FET's exploratory pulses. Just like the MOSFET which has to withstand the high peak current that you elaborated.

    In my original message I wrote "fuse parallel to the secondary rectifier diode". Of course I meant "in series", what you then also assumend, and I also understand the difficulties with this approach, thank you for the explanation.

    If you know of any ressources regarding this topic, I'd be delighted to hear about them, as I couldn't really find much in my search until now.

    Have a nice weekend.

    Regards,

    Alex