This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ20Z95: BQ20Z95 Cell Imbalances

Part Number: BQ20Z95

We are using the 655 in preproduction and see packs where one cell in a 3S1P stack looks to be self-discharging rapidly once assembled into packs.  Cells are mated into a 3S1P pack only if their OCV is within 30mV of each other, but once attached to the 655, one cell has it's OCV rapidly decay to diverge from the other two cells by 300mV or more.  The other two cells remain within a few mV of each other.  The cell number (1, 2, 3) is random and occurs with equal frequency, so it is not 'position dependent' in the stack.  This is exactly what I expect would happen if a cell balancing FET remained switched on when not in CV charging mode. The only difference in our design from "datasheet-schematic" use is our cell balancing resistors are 150 ohms.  This problem occurs in 1 to 5% of the packs we build and is impacting our ability to launch production.

Please help me understand if this is possible - and if not possible what could be causing this OCV divergence only once mated with the bq20z655.  We are using high quality cells from a company known for high reliability cells used in space, ocean and on other planets, so it is very unlikely to be a problem caused by cells.

Are there any diagnostics or flags that can tell us when each individual balancing transistor turns on?

Thanks,

Doug

This was a post regarding the bq20z655 I found while looking for another issue. We have a similar issue with the bq20z95. I know this is an older gas gauge, but it is used in a medical device and updating is not an option at this time. The majority of what we find, however, is with batteries that have been fielded. 

While I don't expect that the balancing FET is sticking on, I do have to ask if there is a possibility of an imbalance in the in the balancing circuit resistors that could cause a cell to become imbalanced during the charge cycle due to to a difference in the resistances of the balancing circuit.

I have checked the series resistors on several of them, and found them all to be within 1% of their stated resistance, so it does not appear to be an issue there. However, it does beg the question of how imbalanced the resistances need to be to cause an imbalance in the cells over time.

  • hi Jeffrey

    What is your update status? for the cell balancing to be active, update status needs to be 0E.  Also, can you capture on a scope the voltages across the  cells to see if cell balancing is going on? Especially across the bottom cell ? if cell balancing is occurring, there would be some pulse width modulation going on which the scope will be able to capture

    Can you also check the filter caps on the pins incase you have a bad cap that is shorted and bleeding the cell

    thanks

    Onyx

  • Update status is 06. I don't believe the bq20z95 has an update status of 0E. I do know that SMBUS reports CB happening during charge, but the scope information might be very helpful. 

  • that's right..this is a really old gauge that didn't have update status 0E. Let me know if and how you find a solution to your issue.

    thanks

    Onyx