This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

UCC28634: Transformer behaviour

Part Number: UCC28634

I actually would like some advice regarding the flyback transformer design. Perhaps this enquiry can be passed on to someone with expertise in this area.

I had wound two transformers on RM10 cores with turns ratio of 34:4:7. One transformer worked extremely well and the other gave results of more than 2% less efficient. I thought that I had wound these identically and they had the same inductance and leakage. I then realised that I had wound the secondaries in opposite directions which I thought would not matter because I had phased the wings correctly anyway.

As a last resort, I unwound the worst transformer and rewound it to be identical with the better performing transformer. this solved the discrepancy and both transformers work well BUT, the secondaries are in fact wound in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION to the primaries. When wound in the same direction the performance is not as good.

At 30V/2.5A output, before rewinding, one unit had less than 90% efficiency and the other 92% efficiency with a mains input of 240VAC. After rewinding, both units perform at 92% efficiency.

I must add that this is using synchronous rectifiers in the ground side.

Our transformer supplier cannot explain this so I am trying to find out if there is something more to this and I thought someone at T.I. may help or give me a lead.

  • Hi Sidd,

    The UCC28634 is supported by our team in the US who are currently on Thanksgiving holidays, they will be back in the office on Monday and will reply then.

    Regards

    Peter

  • Hi Peter,

    I have no problem with the UCC28634 per say, I am unfamiliar with how to approach E2E on a related problem we have which may need to be directed to someone with transformer knowledge or dismissed altogether if E2E does not wish to become involved with problems outside actual I.C.'s.

    Regards,

    Peter

  • Hello Peter,

    I am not a transformer expert.  However, this might have to do with parasitic capacitance between windings.  It may have more parasitic capacitance when wound in a different direction that could create more losses.

    Lloyd Dixon had written some papers on magnetic design that might be helpful. 

    Their is also a magnetic seminar paper written by Seamus O'Driscoll, Peter Meaney, John Flannery and Georg Young that you might find helpful as well.

    Regards,

  • Thank you Mike,

    There are some good points in the seminar paper which may be the cause. I will investigate these further.

    I would like to leave this thread open for a day or so in case somebody has something to add. Any information is most welcome.

    Peter

  • Hi Mike,

    It may be that I have been on the wrong track from the start. I originally wound the transformers with litz wire on the primaries. Recently I wound similar transformers as replacements but with simple Bi-filar format on the primary halves. One of these showed remarkedly similar performance to the original transformer wound with litz.

    I started unwinding the transformer which had poor performance and noticed that one of the Bi-filar turns on one half of the primary, was open circuit. As soon as this was corrected, the transformer worked perfectly.

    It is something to watch out for that it is easy to miss-solder some turns when terminating litz wire.

    Thanks again to you and the E2E guys. Peter