This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS22967: Cin vs Cout

Part Number: TPS22967

Hello E2E,

In section 9.1.2 of the TPS22967 DS, it states that:

Because of the integrated body diode in the NMOS switch, a CIN greater than CL is highly recommended. A CL greater than CIN can cause VOUT to exceed VIN when the system supply is removed. This could result in current flow through the body diode from VOUT to VIN. A CIN to CL ratio of 10 to 1 is recommended for minimizing VIN dip caused by inrush currents during start-up; however, a 10-to-1 ratio for capacitance is not required for proper functionality of the device. A ratio smaller than 10 to 1 (such as 1 to 1) could cause slightly more VIN dip upon turnon due to inrush currents. This can be mitigated by increasing the capacitance on the CT pin for a longer rise time (see below).

 

In my customer's application, they are using 47uF of Cin and 22uF of Cout = Cl.  However, there is an additional 100uF + 47uF of Cout at an FPGA input.  How critical is the Cin > Cout spec.  If there is some distance between the output of the load switch and the FPGA, would that help mitigate the need for more Cin?  Are there concerns about the Cin node have 22uF and Cout have 169uF?

Thanks!

Russell

  • Hi Russell,

    Thank you for your questions about TPS22967!

    The recommended 10:1 capacitor ratio helps minimize the voltage dip on VIN due to transient inrush current when the device is turned on. For the capacitor values mentioned, CIN = 47uF and CL = 169uF, inrush current is something to consider. In order to mitigate inrush current with this capacitor ratio, it is recommended to increase capacitance on the CT pin for a longer rise time.

    Additionally, the main benefit of QOD is that the output voltage is not left floating when the device is powered down as this can damage a load downstream. The QOD feature in the TPS22967 will quickly power down the device in a controlled manner.

    Please let me know if you have any more questions regarding the TPS22967.

    Best regards,

    Rachel Richardson

    If my reply answered your question, please click the "This resolved my issue" button. This can help others verify that a solution was found!