This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS1663: Thermal shutdown of VQFN vs HTSSOP package

Part Number: TPS1663

I have the TPS1663 evaluation board that uses the HTSSOP package.  I am doing some experiments on the ability of the part to handle the inrush current in my system without hitting thermal shutdown.  So far things look good.  However, I want to use the VQFN packge in my actual system.  The thermal metrics of the two packages are very similar - Rja of 31.4 °C/W for the VQFN and 32.2 °C/W for the HTSSOP.  Other metrics are similarly close.  Would you expect the thermal performance of the VQFN package to be fairly similar to the HTSSOP on the eval board?

Or, to put it another way, Figure 13 (of the TPS1663 datasheet) shows the thermal shutdown time vs. power dissipation of the HTSSOP package.  Would you expect this graph to be very similar for the VQFN package?

  • Hi David,

    Thanks for reaching out!

    Figure 13 is taken for VQFN package and we expect it to be very close for HTSSOP package.

    Best Regards, Rakesh

  • Thank you, yes, I got that backwards - I was using the HTSSOP package on the eval board, and the graph is for the VQFN, which is the part I want to use.

    I was able to stress the HTSSOP beyond the requirements for my system by as much as 50% and the part did not hit thermal shutdown.  Safe to say the VQFN will remain out of shutdown as well?

  • Hi David,

    OK. got it. The thermal impedance is almost same for both the packages so similar thermal shutdown performance is expected. As you already considered 50% margin, it is completely safe for both the packages.

    Best Regards, Rakesh