Other Parts Discussed in Thread: , LM25180, LM5161, LM5017
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello Avik,
I will check with the team internally and see if we have any available data on this.
Regards,
Alejandro
Hi Avik,
One option is to choose an appropriate TVS to clamp the incoming transient voltage event. The abs max on VIN is 70V. Given that Vin-max is 60V here, there isn't much margin. However, you can also include a damped LC input filter to attenuate the incoming transient.
Regards,
Tim
Hi Tim
The 10V margin is the main reason for concern. All the shunt types of clamping devices like TVS, MOVs, etc have a much higher breakdown margin. If I select a device with a clamping voltage of around 70V, then it will interfere within the normal operating range itself i.e. before 60V. But, still for trials I tried using an SMBJ TVS diode to see where it actually clamps the transient voltage and the TVS itself got blown!
I have played around with several values of inductors and there are two issues I came across-
1. The inductor seems to damp the transient but then the lower point of my power supply gets shifted and that I can't do. Since the required power supply range is 12-60VDC, I need it to start from at least 11V and lower the better. Because of the additional drop across the inductor the starting point gets shifted to greater than 12V.
2. After selecting an appropriate value of inductor (approx. 500mH) considering the above tradeoff, the clamped voltage reaching Vin is around 80-85V which is still dangerous for the IC.
Please share your thoughts on how to counter these points or any other clamping mechanism we can work with.
Thanks,
Avik
Hi Alejandro
Any Surge / Transient compliance-related data for LM5180 or any other similar part would be very helpful.
Also, you must have done internal EMI/EMC testing for these parts. Please share some related schematic or design inputs so that I can implement the same.
Thanks,
Avik
Hi Avik,
Please consult the TI Designs for the LM5180/-Q1 and LM25180/-Q1 provided in the respective product folders. Also, EMI results are available in the datasheets and EVM user's guides.
Given that Vin-max of the application is 60V and you need to clamp prior to 70V, a TVS may not work as its clamping voltage for the surge current level is well above its standoff voltage. An input LC filter would attenuate the surge waveform, something like 10uH and 100uF (500mH above sounds excessive). This should not affect input UVLO as the DC drop across the input inductor is minimal.
Another option to consider is our 100V Fly-Buck converters such as the LM5161 (100V/1A) and LM5017 (100V/0.7A). This gives increased Vin margin to manage incoming transients.
Regards,
Tim