Dear Support team,
Could you please review below schematic and feedback to improve performance?
Best Regards,
Hirokazu Takahashi
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear Support team,
Could you please review below schematic and feedback to improve performance?
Best Regards,
Hirokazu Takahashi
Takahashi-san,
Using the 2.2uH inductor does look better so you can continue using that. With this high a VIN and low VOUT (14V-17V-> 0.85V), the device is most likely running with min on-time pulses. It should increase the off-time to be able to regulate the VOUT but this will reduce the switching frequency from the nominal 650kHz expected.
Here is what you can try:
Thanks,
Amod
Hello Amod-san
Thanks for your support.
We found fSW vibration. I attached waveform below.
Average : 512kHz, frequency range 382~602kHz
Since I think the fSW will be constant, does such a vibration mean any functional issue?

Best Regards,
Hirokazu Takahashi
Takahashi-san,
Yes I assume this scope shot is taken in persistence mode and you are observing the jitter inherent to the control scheme of TPS54527. So, it is normal to have frequency variation.
In general, the DCAP2 control scheme has off-time jitter because on-time is modulated and off-time is variable. It is possibly a bit more pronounced in your case with the 0.85V Vout and high 15+V Vin as you are likely generating min on-time pulses and the off-time has to increase to ensure regulation. Here is a good read on jitter in DCAP or COT control schemes vs the regular voltage/current mode control: https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slua747a/slua747a.pdf
Thanks,
Amod