Because of the holidays, TI E2E™ design support forum responses will be delayed from Dec. 25 through Jan. 2. Thank you for your patience.

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Fuel Gauge BQ34Z100-G1 with protection circuit BQ29700: Which implementation is correct ?

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ34Z100-G1

Dear all,

I am designing a device with a single cell Li-Ion battery that is protected by a bq29700 and the SoC is measured by the fuel gauge bq34z100-G1.

I made a first prototype PCB but after seeing carefully, I guess I made a mistake about the schematic.

So, if you look at the 'simplified schematic' for  the bq34z100-g1, you can see that the current consumed by the bq34z100-g1 is not taken into account by the shunt resistor! Ok, this current is very low and may be ignored.

Moreover, with the bq29700, the MOSFET are connected to the Cell- and not Cell+ like in the simplified schematic. So, I just would like to show you my schematic (in a simple way) and it would be great to have your feedback since I will do the final design soon.

As you can see in the picture, my first try (with Vss connected to Pack-) can take into account the current consumed by the bq34z100-G1 which was a good idea. But... after seeing carefully, I saw that the battery voltage measured by the algorithm to estimate the SoC will not be accurate. Indeed, there will be a voltage drop across the shunt resistor, so the fuel gauge will see the shunt resistor (and MOSFET) voltage in addition of the cell voltage.

So, it seems to be a trade-off... but since the current needed by the fuel gauge is extremely low, I guess I must do the modification and connect the Vss pin to Cell- instead of Pack-.

What is you opinion?

Best regards,

Christian