This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC-ANTENNA-DK2: DN023 MIFA - Frequency much too low

Part Number: CC1101

I am designing a 915 MHz meandered inverted F antenna (MIFA), based on DN023, for use with your CC1101 IC. I am tuning it with a cheap 'LiteVNA' network analyser. 

My ground plane is larger than in the reference design (drawing below), the PCB is slightly thicker, and there is also a large battery below the board. I think this is causing the resonant frequency of the antenna to be much lower than specified in the design note.

When sized for 915 MHz (i.e. L6 = 1mm, based on DN023), the antenna resonates at ~750 MHz.

Without a matching network, I had to shorten the antenna by a large amount to get it tuned to 915 MHz:

Then, when I put it in an enclosure, the resonant frequency drops again, so I'll have to shorten it even more. This seems concerning, I don't want to lose too much antenna. 

I have three questions:

  1. Is there a problem with using this antenna geometry here? Or is this expected due to the bigger ground plane etc, and it just needs to be shortened?
  2. What is better for performance: severely shortening the antenna like in the above image, or using a matching network to artificially raise the resonant frequency? My understanding is that it would be best to get the frequency as close as possible to 915MHz by shortening the antenna, then use matching components to cancel out any complex impedance (i.e. get it as close to 50Ω + 0j as possible). But if there is a better way (maybe adjusting the spacing of the grounded part of the antenna?) I'm all ears.
  3. If it's ok to shorten the antenna by so much, can I modify the geometry of the 'meander' to take better advantage of the space I have? So keeping the shortened length, just reducing the meander to make the antenna wider. Example below.

Thanks for your help, this antenna stuff is hard.

  • Hi,

    The liteVNA is a nice piece of equipment at a low cost for a VNA.

    1. A larger GND plane will cause a lower resonance since one part of the antenna is the actual antenna trace and the other is the GND plane it self. Therefore, by changing the GND plane size will always affect the resonance. This is why we always recommend to have a pi-network for our antenna ref designs since we do not know the exact dimension of the GND plane for the end-application.

    2. When matching the antenna, the default pi-network antenna match should initially be a series 0 ohm or 100 pF capacitor (for 868/915 MHz). Then adjust the antenna length accordingly until you obtain the wanted resonance. 

    3. It is OK to change the structure of the antenna. The best performance will be when the antenna is as physically large as possible but whilst still maintaining the same resonance. So if you have the possibility to stretch out the antenna length and decrease the height of the meandering structure, this will be beneficial for the antenna design. The meandering format is just a compromise to fit a certain length into an area. One drawback with meandering is it shortens the electrical length due to the opposing currents in the structure so by using less meandering (whilst keeping the same resonance) will be an advantage. 

    Hope this helps. 

  • Thank you for your detailed response. I will find the suitable antenna length, then reduce the meander as much as possible in the space I have. For the existing antenna results above, do you think the return loss (15dB @ 915MHz) and bandwidth look decent for a PCB antenna of this style? Thanks.

  • Hi,

    A return loss greater than 10 dB is good enough so 15 dB is fine.