This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Most appropriate Ambient Light Sensor for an IoT luxometer

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPT4001, OPT3001, OPT4001DTSEVM

Hi,

when reviewing all your ambient light sensors: https://www.ti.com/sensors/specialty-sensors/ambient-light-sensors/products.html

it seems that the differences between them in terms of spectral response are minimal.

We are trying to build some low cost IoT lux sensors, that can measure illuminance as accurately as realistically possible both indoors and outdoors. Depending on the results, then make many more to use on buidlng related applications.

It is possible to obtain accurate handheld luxometers, but they are expensive and not convenient for long term monitoring wirelessly. There are some other very accurate lux sensors, but they are prohibitively expensive.

We are looking for a balance between cost and accuracy.

Based on the above:

1) Would there be any specific sensor from your line of ambient light sensors that you would rate as more appropriate for this application? Would you recommend a different sensor for indoors and another for outdoors?

(The spectral response seems very similar between all of them on the above list and there are some differences in the angular response).

2)OPT4001 SOT-5X3 seems to have the best spectral response, angular response and lux range.

In the spectral response it seems this sensor is sensitive between ~350-400nm. Is there a way to bypass this, so that the almost perfect spectral response can be utilised?

3)Would you recommend using a cosine corrector on top of the sensor, so that a proper lux measurement can be obtained?

If yes, are there any recommendations on how this should be designed so that the cosine corrector sits appropriately above the sensor?

thanks

  • Hello,

    For this type of application, I would recommend the OPT4001DTS (SOT 5x3) which will give you the same great performance both indoors and outdoors.  This device will give increased angular IR rejection in comparison to the OPT3001.  Our testing has shown great accuracy between our sensor and a lux meter without any additional correction needed.  I would recommend testing with an OPT4001DTSEVM first to see performance compared to a lux meter.

    Rahland

  • Thank you so much for this information.

    I looked into the OPT4001DTSEVM so that I can test it, but I cannot find additional information if it is the OPT4001 pico star sensor, or the OPT4001 STO 5x3 sensor.
    How can you tell which one it is?

    If the sensor proves suitable for the application, the idea is to have it as an I2C optical sensor, so that it can be connected to a Lorawan device.

    Are there ready made modules/boards of the OPT4001 STO 5x3 that can be used straight away?
    Here is an example of the OPT3001, which can be connected directly to a Lorawan device, as it is I2C:

    www.ebay.co.uk/.../294657038614

     I am a novice in all of this, so all this information is new to me

  • Hello Spyros,

    The OPT4001DTSEVM is the OPT4001 in the SOT 5x3 package and can be found here.  The OPT4001YMNEVM is the OPT4001 in the PicoStar package and can be found here.

    If you want to use the PicoStar package, i suggest viewing this video first about bottom facing packages.

    Rahland