AWR2944EVM: The configuration of the parameter 'frameCfg'

Hi,

Please add what example you are referring to and where you see this change. 

Thanks,

Pradipta.

Hi Pradipta,

  In the demo 'lab0015_high_end_corner_radar' of the toolbox 'mmwave_automotive_toolbox_3_6_0',  the configuration is "frameCfg 0 5 128 0 384 250 1 0".But in the demo 'high_end_corner_radar' of the toolbox 'radar_toolbox_1_10_00_13', that is 'frameCfg 0 5 128 0 384 50 1 0 ', the frame period is reduced to 50ms from 250ms, what did you do  to achive that?

BR,

Rata

Hi Kaushik,

   Thanks for your reply, several optimizations are introduced in the datapath processing chain, what about the processing result?Is that is idential with the previous algrithm?

BR,

Rata

Hi Kaushik，

  Thanks for your reply,I got it. You said the results are improved in certain areas,which areas?

BR

Rata

Hi Rata,

Result improvement can mainly be observed in angle or xyz estimation.

Regards,

Kaushik

Hi Kaushik,

     You said 'Result improvement can mainly be observed in angle or xyz estimation', I want to know whether there is an improvement in angle resolution or the angle  accuray?

BR,

Rata

Hi Rata,

The improvements were with respect to angle accuracy and few bugfixes with elevation angle estimation. You can refer to the source code for more details.

Regards,

Kaushik