AWR1843: I2C slave operation (Con't #2)

Koichiro Tashiro

Part Number: AWR1843

Tool/software:

Hi Samhitha,

Sorry for my late reply. Please find the answer from the customer to your below question in the original post.

>Is the customer facing any issue if they use the source files of I2C from mmwave_sdk_03_06_02_00-LTS?

Yes. The customer tried to replace the modified "i2c_slave.c" file you provided in the old thread.
The SDK version is mmwave_sdk_03_05_00_04. They just replaced "i2c_slave.c" file.
But it causes a build error.

Thanks and regards,
Koichiro Tashiro

over 1 year ago

0 Samhitha Bobba over 1 year ago

TI__Mastermind 20960 points

Hi Koichiro,

I need some time to test with 3.5.0.4 SDK. Please expect a response by end of this week.

Regards,

Samhitha

0 Koichiro Tashiro over 1 year ago in reply to Samhitha Bobba

TI__Mastermind 22935 points

Hi Samhitha,

Could you reply to this item?

Thanks and regards,
Koichiro Tashiro

0 Samhitha Bobba over 1 year ago in reply to Koichiro Tashiro

TI__Mastermind 20960 points

Hi Koichiro,

The only difference in I2C driver source code 3.5.0.4 SDK and 3.6.2.0 SDK is that 2-3 extra functions are added - I2CSlave_setupTransfer_rw, I2C_slave_read_write. Can you please ask them to remove I2C_slave_read_write callback function from gI2CSlaveFxnTable? I don't have access to the EVM to test the functionality, so the customer can try it at their end and let me know if there is any issue. I suggest the customer to check the difference between I2C driver source code of both the SDKs to get more clarity.

Regards,

Samhitha

Sensors

Sensors forum

AWR1843: I2C slave operation (Con't #2)