This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

IWR1843: Implementation for Self-Calibration

Part Number: IWR1843

Tool/software:

Hello,

We would like to incorporate the recommended operation method for Self-Calibration and minimize the variation in target signal strength due to temperature changes.
Specifically, our current radar system performs all Self-Calibration in the field.
The document for Self-Calibration (SPRACF4C) recommends using the values calibrated at the Factory for certain items in the Field.
We would like to incorporate this mechanism.

We have evaluated the Self-Calibration.
orange graphs of Fig. 1 to 3 show the results of continuously measuring the reflected signal intensity of the reflector when the radar and reflector were placed in a thermostatic chamber and the environmental temperature was varied from -40 deg C to +80 deg C. The settings for Fig. 1 to 3 are shown in Table 1.
Green graphs plot the average values of 10 internal temperature sensors in the MMIC.
(The experiments were conducted after confirming that no reflection from the thermostatic chamber at the same distance as the reflector was observed.)
The radar used in Fig. 1 to 3 is the same unit for all measurements.

Q1: In the previous thread (e2e.ti.com/.../), it was advised to turn off run-time calibration (MMWave_ChirpCalibrationCfg>enablePeriodicity=false). Is this advice appropriate for the stated purpose?
(Which setting between Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 is correct? If neither is recommended, please provide the correct settings.)
Q2: How much variation in signal intensity is expected due to temperature? Since the Rx Gain LUT is in 2dB increments, is there a way to limit the variation to around 2dB?

Best regards,
Yasuaki

  • Hi,

    We are looking into your query. Please allow us a couple of days to respond.

    Regards

  • Hello,

    How is the progress going?
    Could you please provide a response by January 8th?
    Alternatively, please let me know the date by which you can provide a response.

    Best regards,
    Yasuaki

  • Hi

    1.The thread you are referring to unavailable but we have recommended to disable only the periodic run time calibration. Initial run time calibration after power on needs to be run mandatorily. Also, our recommendation is to execute the run time calibration when there is change in the temperature by +/-40C

    This would avoid frequent changes in the rx gain values which would lead to changes in measrements

    2. 2dB is the minimum resolution for Rx gain. It is not possible to change that. When you execute run time calibration based on significant temperature change would avoid +/-2dB changes of rx gain frequenctly

    Regards

  • Hello, 

    I apologize for not providing the link to the thread. The link was supposed to lead to the thread titled "Where should Self-Calibration be carried out(Link)".
    we understand that there is a possibility for the sensitivity (Rx Gain) to vary by about 2dB depending on the temperature.
    We are concerned about the fact that the sensitivity varies significantly more than 2dB when there is a temperature transition from -40 degrees to +80 degrees.
    As shown in Fig. 1, the sensitivity varies by approximately 7dB.
    Please let us know whether our settings are incorrect or if this is the expected sensitivity variation.
    And the variation range also changes depending on the combination of settings (Fig. 1-3).
    Please advice us the settings to minimize these variation.

    Regards

  • Hello,
    How is the progress going?
    It would be appreciated if you could provide a response by the end of this week.
    Regards,

  • Hi

    Yes, there will be variation of around 7dB when there is a temperature variation from -40C to +80C. So, our recommendation is not to run the calibration for every 10C variation but to run it at every 40C variation, this would ensure that there are fewer steps of gain variation that you would see

    Regards