This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMP006 layout, continued:

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMP006

Hello--
In reading the guidelines SBOU108 and forum history, I see that assembly using flux only is the documented process. 
Is there a problem using normal SAC305 paste with organic water-clean flux?
 If the PCBA stencil is excluding the TMP006, then assembly would likely need a second pass to apply flux only before placement.  

Might it make more sense to follow the EVM, and have the TMP006 on a separate little PCBA that uses
the flux-only process?  How does TI spec the EVM assembly?

So many questions, so little time before production... :-)
TIA again -- Joe

 

  • Hello again Joe,

    I'm going to have to defer these specific assembly-related questions to our technician who has more experience in this area. I'll pass this question along to him and let you know his opinions.

    Best regards,

    Ian Williams

  • Hi Joe,

    The word from our technician is that for the TMP006 no solder paste is necessary. The BGA balls will melt during the reflow process and flow onto the pads, providing a good electrical and mechanical connection. The type of flux isn't critical - any organic, water-soluble flux will do.

    If you are applying a paste+flux combo to the rest of your board, then you would have to do a second flux-only pass for the TMP006. I just looked through the assembly documentation of the TMP006EVM and didn't find any specific instructions regarding flux and solder paste. 

    Best regards,

    Ian Williams

  • Ian-- Thanks for the fast response again.  I will pass this onto our assembly vendor and see what they say.

    Is there any chance of TI offering the EVM target part as a product? We actually are using these in our prototypes.
    Kind of like the http://www.ti.com/tool/ez430-t2012  MSP430 target boards....

    Thanks! -- Joe

  • Joe,

    I don't think anything like what you suggest has been done before by our group, but for the right business case anything is possible...

    Regards,

    Ian Williams