This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LDC1000 sensor mechanics

There seem to be a few missing details in the data sheet. First, I cannot get the frequency counter to run at tank frequencies of 25 -30 Khz, the count register is off by a factor of 4 to 10. Based on the formulas given to derive frequency from the 24 bit count data, I am guessing the counter counts up at 1/3 the external clock frequency for 'LDC response time' cycles of tank oscillation, and then holds that as the 24 bit frequency data. Is this correct ? there is no clear explanation in the data sheet. Are there situations where a better ( or only possible) frequency measurement requires a lower external clock frequency  than the 6 Mhz on the EVM ?

Second, is there an approximation for the ideal filter cap value or is cut and fit the only way to tune the LDO ? At 28 Khz, I tried 100 pF thru .05 uf in decade steps. At .01, the filter waveform was at 1 VAC amplitude, but I still had no good frequency counting .

And third, doesn't the approximation for the Rs => Rp transformation impose some limitations on the ratio of the tank L and C ?  Are there  limits to that ratio ? I tried a 3 mH coil with a .01 cap, for an oscillator frequency of about 28 Khz. I am inclined to try use a 500 pF cap but am concerned about having an "unbalanced" LC combination. 

On the surface, the chip is indeed amazing in its sensitivity to metal surface area and proximity. We are trying to sense  ferrous material flow rate, and although the chip looks very promising the data sheet does not seem to provide a lot more than a cookbook approach, and offers few alternatives when things aren't working or tools to evaluate margins of error for a final design .  Any answers out there ?

     

  • Hello Gregory,

    It's a SW issue. I am referring your concern to our SW developer. He will update you on fix ETA.

    The higher the ref. clock, the better L measurements.

    Due to a vast variety of applications and sensor (coil) solution, it's impossible to "calculate" CF value. The empiric method you described is the best approach. Freq. counter will be fixed in the next rev. of SW/FW

    The formula will work for any LC tanks that the LDC1000 can drive. Do not worry about it.

    We are working on the apps notes to facilitate application implementations.

  • Hi Gregory,

    The 24-bit update is coming and scheduled at the moment for 1/17/2014.  At the moment the GUI can only display 16-bits L.

    Thanks!

  • thanks. As it turns out, I was eventually able to get nice frequency count results by obtaining a more accurate ( or shall we say actually in the ballpark!) Q value for the inductor. Not having a modern network analyzer available I had made a grossly incorrect Rp approximation using a signal analyzer to approximate the tank Q.Having repeated it with an old analog HP Q meter, an apparently more correct Rp approximation fixed the frequency measurement problem. At this time the frequency counter works but the L value from the GUI seems to read very wrong. As far as the GUI goes, in a few weeks I'll have the LDC glued into an msp430 on new R&D controller prototype and evaluate the chip's performance without relying on the GUI.