This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LDC1000 EVM precision measurement on Rp impendance

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LDC1612, LDC1101

Hello all

I have a question about the sensitivity and stability about the impendance measurement of using the LDC1000 EVM.

Since I need to obtain a precise measurement of the impendance, I set the RpMin 9.25 kOhm and RpMaX 16.16kOhm in order to get a higher resolution this measurement. Resonance frequency is 6kHz. The frequency count setting is 192. voltage 4v.

Also, I have changed to original filter capacitor into a 3.3uF one , whcih gives a voltage about 600mV on the CFB pin with my settings.

The test is carried out by placing my probe at a fixed poistion on the sample. Then I run the test for 20 times (each time I will used the Matlab to collect data and also the bad data will be filter out by digital filter designed in Matlab)

The measurment on the inductance is very accurate but it is not the case for the Impendacne.

For example, I list the measurement of the impendance result as followed.

Test starts

test 1; 12.95196 kOhm 

test 2; 12.95349 kOhm 

test 3; 12.94662 kOhm 

test 4; 12.94618 kOhm 

test 5; 12.94465 kOhm 

Stop for 1 min, then restart the test.

test 6; 12.95528 kOhm  

test 7; 12.95041 kOhm 

test 8; 12.94996 kOhm 

test 9; 12.94406 kOhm

test 10; 12.94131 kOhm 

Stop again, wait for 5 min, then restart the test.

test 11; 12.92854 kOhm

test 12; 12.93317 kOhm

test 13; 12.93353 kOhm 

test 14; 12.93079 kOhm

test 15; 12.92880 kOhm 

test 16; 12.92445 kOhm 

test 17; 12.92105 kOhm

test 18; 12.91708 kOhm

test 19; 12.91755 kOhm 

test 20; 12.92028 kOhm       

In addition, each test has a very low standard deviation (STD) of about 0.002 kOhm, which means that each test result is quite reliable.

However, as you can see in the mean value listed above, the Rp FLUCTUATE a lot compared to the STD mentioned just now.

So, in you guys's opinion, what is the possible reason for this behavior and any suggestion to improve the performance of the probe.

Thank you very much!

  • Hello Ting,
    you are likely seeing a temperature effect. The conductivity of the target material varies over temperature. For example, a copper target has a temperature coefficient of 3900ppm/K.
    In most applications, L-measurements provide better results because temperature coefficients are a fraction of those of RP measurements. RP measurements are mainly recommended for metal type identification; for all other applications, consider using L-measurements.

    If you are not doing metal type identification, I would also recommend exploring one of our newer devices such as the LDC1101 and the LDC1612; they have better noise performance, lower power consumption, and easier system design integration.
  • Hello Ben

    Thank you for the fast reply.
    I am thinking of using the LDC1101 EVM board in the future since you said it may have a better noise performance.
    I have another question, since I am using Matlab, it is possible to use LDC1101 EVM for Matlab?
    If yes, would you kindly provide me a copy of the Matlab code since I cannot find it in the website.

    Thank you
  • Hello Ting,

    I'm afraid we don't have Matlab code examples available.