This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Yes, and here is a reference design: http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDA-00218
The max current sensed depends on the flux concentrator used, the air gap, and the distance to the wire.
The DRV411 is more specifically targeted at current sensing, and can give much higher accuracy and bandwidth.
Best regards,
RE
There's actually an easy way to achieve more current range in that reference design. The DRV5053VA was used, which has 90mV/mT typical gain. The other device versions produce lower gain, and the output won't saturate until more flux density is applied.
I reached out to the DRV411 expert, and he should be replying soon.
Best regards,
RE
Hello Muthukumar,
The DRV411 and the DRV421 can measure above 50A. Both require cores with windings which will determine the measurement range. Both of these devices are closed loop systems that require the winding and core to complete the loop. Both have reference designs in the range you are looking for.
DRV411 Reference designs:
±50A Current Sensor using Closed-Loop Compensated Hall Element Reference Design
100A Closed-Loop Current Sensor Reference Design using Bi-Polar Supplies
DRV421 Reference designs:
Fluxgate Magnetic Current Sensing Reference Design with High Linearity for 3–Phase Inverters (50A)
±15A Current Sensor using Closed-Loop Compensated Fluxgate Sensor Reference Design
The DRV421 magnetic core is more involved and we have a system parameter tool to help with the design and other application notes found here.
Each of these devices (DRV421 and DRV411) have their tradeoffs(cost, design time) but both require a magnetic core design.
Please let me know if you have any specific questions.
Regards,
Javier