Because of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S., TI E2E™ design support forum responses may be delayed from November 25 through December 2. Thank you for your patience.

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

AWR1642: Can't choose between AWR and IWR range

Part Number: AWR1642
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: IWR1642

I understand that the AWR is for automotive and IWR is for industrial, but I see no discernable difference between the two in terms of design and capabilities. My project is a low cost collision detection/avoidance system for automobiles. 

  • Hi Shantanu,

    There are differences between IWR and AWR devices as given below. For Automotive applications, the AWR family is recommended:

    1. AWR1xxx devices support a wider junction temperature range, -40C to 125C. IWR versions support -40C to 105C.
    2. AWR1xxx devices are qualified for automotive applications as they are AECQ100 qualified and ASIL-B capable. This is not the case for IWR variants.
    3. Specific to the 1642, AWR1642 has 2 CAN interfaces, one of them being CAN-FD. IWR1642 only has one CAN interface (no CAN-FD).

    Hope that help you choose the right device for your application.

    Regards
    -Nitin

  • Thank you!

    But am I correct in assuming that there is no difference in the functionality between IWR and AWR apart from automotive qualifications and temperature?

  • Hello Nitin,
    As mentioned above CAN FD functionality is not available on IWR1642. In terms of RF alone there is no difference.

    Regards,
    Vivek
  • Hi Shantanu,

    Hope this information was helpful. If you don't have any more questions on this subject, can you please mark the above response as a verified answer?

    Thanks
    -Nitin