Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPT8241
Hi, We are trying to boot up an OPT9221/OPT8241 combo from an EEPROM but without FX2. Got a few questions as to how to drive TIC_CLK because we are seeing no clock activity and deduced the clock needs to be driven from an external source. We also got some confusion.
From the opt9221.pdf document, the pin H1 is named "TIC_CLK" and marked as "input".
But on the reference schematic, there are two pins one named "EXT_TIC_DCLK_IN", and another "TIC_DCLK". Are they the same signal (maybe only tied together in master serial configuration mode)? Are they the same as "TIC_CLK" in opt9221.pdf?
Just would like to clarify the signal mentioned is used to drive the clock on the OPT9221 EEPROM for master serial configuration mode.
In the opt9221.pdf, the figure 17 shows in master serial configuration mode the TIC_CLK is driven from a "Device". Is this device an OPT9221 chip? If so, now it changes from an "input" to an "output". Is this just a typo?
How should we drive this TIC_CLK? We already drive SYSCLK_IN with a 48MHz crystal. Can we drive TIC_CLK with the same clock source at the same frequency? We captured the OPT9221 chip is driving TIC_CSOZ low for about 600ns every few hundred milliseconds, now that it must be derived from the 48MHz SYSCLK_IN. If we drive TIC_CLK at a different speed than SYSCLK_IN, would that be a problem?
Or if this can be an output pin on OPT9221, OPT9221 would output a clock signal to drive the clock on EEPROM. Is that possible and how to make that work?
Update: Since Anand answered this pin is an output driven by OPT9221 in master configuration mode. Now that we are seeing TIC_CSOZ being driven low for about 600ns every few hundred ms. But when probing we see TIC_CONF_DONE keeps low from the beginning and in the whole time line, and INT_OUT rises with power then keeps high.
Since TIC_CSOZ is driven, can that mean the master serial configuration mode has been configured right? We have checked the boot[2:0] to be 011 that should be correct, but will double check again.