This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

OPT3002: How to decompose optical power through the different wavelengths

Part Number: OPT3002
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPT3001

Hello,

We are thinking of using the OPT3002 sensor to monitor the optical power to which the sensor is being exposed to. For this monitoring system we are interested in the discrimination of the optical power per wavelength. My question is, how can we do this with the OPT3002?

Should I just use the equation 4 present on chapter "Compensation for spectral response" (Optical_Power at Wavelength W = Optical_Power at 505 nm / R)? For example, if the sensor is being exposed to daylight, and I want to know the optical power at wavelength 400nm, 500nm and 600nm, should I just take the value reported by OPT3002 and decompose it on this 3 wavelengths using equation 4 present on chapter "Compensation for spectral response"?

Regards,

Carlos

  • Hi Carlos,

    Equation 4 only works for a single wavelength input. If you take a look at "Figure 2. Spectral Response vs Wavelength" you'll see that the sensor responds differently at different wavelengths. If you are trying to measure the intensity of a single wavelength and you can ensure that no other wavelengths are exposed to the sensor then you can compensate for the sensor's normalized response at that wavelength using equation 4. However, if multiple wavelengths are present then there is no way to determine how much a specific wavelength contributes to the overall sensor reading.

    Best,

    Alex
  • Hello Alex,

    Thanks for the rapid response.
    Just one more doubt:
    To get the optical power from the OPT3002 I need to use equation 2 (Optical_Power = (2 E[3:0] ) × R[11:0] × 1.2 [nW/cm 2 ]), where E is characterized in table 8: "Result Register: Full-Scale Range (FSR) and LSB Size as a Function of Exponent Level" for wavelength 505nm. When I expose the sensor to the sun light, which is composed by multiple wavelength, and calculate the output power with equation 2 what will be the meaning of that result?
    What I really want to know is, if the sensor is exposed to multiple wave lengths will the optical power outputted by it have any useful meaning, or the sensor will be useless in such situations?

    Thanks,
    Carlos
  • Hi Carlos,

    The sensor still gives you an intensity reading. This reading is equivalent to taking the sum (integral across wavelength) of the sensor's nominal response (from figure 2) multiplied by the intensity of the input light at each wavelength. Please let me know if this explanation does not make sense and I will try to expand on it more.

    In an application with many wavelengths, such as sunlight, the sensor can be used to measure relative light levels and detect changes in lighting conditions. Does your application require

    1) measuring the power at multiple wavelengths for sunlight (e.g. 300, 400, 500nm)
    2) obtaining a single overall power reading for with all the wavelengths combined
    3) detecting relative changes in lighting?

    And what type of precision are you looking for? As I noted above, 1) will be tough with this sensor. 2) is possible depending on how precise you need the reading.

    Best,

    Alex
  • Hello Alex,

    There is no need to expand more your explanation, I think I understood it.

    What I need to know is the overall amount of lumen to which the user is exposed to in the visible spectrum.

    However, the sensor output is mw/cm2, and to convert it to lumen (according to this site: www.dfisica.ubi.pt/.../ch07.html), I need the light wavelength. This means that I cannot perform the conversion, because the sensor output in mw/cm2 is the integration of all the lights received on its wide optical spectrum range, right?

    Is it possible to convert the sensor output to lumen?

    Thanks,

    Carlos

     

  • Hi Carlos,

    Have you taken a look at OPT3001? It outputs a lux (lumens/m^2) measurement directly so hopefully you won't even need to do a calculation.

    Some background comparing OPT3002 and OPT3001. OPT3002 has a more flat response across wavelength whereas OPT3001 has a response that mimics that of the human eye. This makes OPT3001 really good for any application where you care about precisely measuring brightness as perceived by the human eye. Measurements in lumens use the luminosity curve (human eye response), which is the response of the OPT3001.

    I would advise using OPT3001 if you require a measurement in lumens (OPT3002 is better if you just need relative brightness or no human eye response).

    Best,

    Alex

  • Hello Alex,

    Thanks for the prompt reply.

    In fact OPT3001 is the ideal sensor for our application. 

    Thanks for the help.

    Carlos