This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

IWR1642BOOST: Multi-target Detection

Part Number: IWR1642BOOST

Customer was able to confirm that single target detection as pretty good. With nothing but anechoic foam in the field of view, it had a fair excess gain for a human for a long range.

However, the noise generated by other targets becomes an issue. In the plot below, a target off the left at 3m and a target straight ahead at 4m and a targets off to the right at 5m is present. The 8m target is a 1st harmonic of the 4m target.

The targets generate a lot of noise in both directions (angle and distance dimensions). This raises the noise floor all around the targets. So once you have a strong target in the field of view, now in order to detect a weak target (human) somewhere, it must have >40k amplitude counts instead of the 4k amplitude counts required when no other targets were in the field of view.

It appears that the only way to effectively work with multiple targets is to use speed information and track them. But if multiple targets are not moving this doesn’t work.

How do we explain this behavior?

Regards,
Mark

  • Hi Mark,

    In most cases moving targets are actually easier to detect because they are visible on both the Range FFT and Doppler FFT whereas detection of static objects will only show up via Range FFT. As a result the detection of static objects will tend to be less precise (but not less accurate) than moving ones.

    Is this what you are asking about? Are you trying to get better detection of your static objects? More reflective objects will help immensely in this regard. What kind of objects are you detecting right now?

    Hope all is well for you and the team!


    Cheers,
    Akash