Hi,
I have an application were I am only interested in the range profile acquired as fast as I can (no velocity or aoa requirements). I have modified the MmwDemo_dataPathTask function in the demo software to accomplish this. One major change was to determine the clutter signature outside the while(1) loop. Performing clutter removal inside this loop provided a nice dynamic approach but I did not want to spend the time. I have a few questions to pose.
1. I have set the frame periodicity fairly small since I do not have any data to be transferred. My output is only a state change on GPIO_0 which does not have any significant over head. I am using only one transmit and receive antenna with one to 4 chirps. For my fastest clutter removal algorithm, I need only one chirp which really allows me a fast chirping rate. My question is: can the part overheat since I am consistently driving the transmitter and not letting it cool during any processing period? I essentially have no processing period for part cooling. The first few lines of the configuration file is:
sensorStop
flushCfg
dfeDataOutputMode 1
channelCfg 1 1 0
adcCfg 2 1
adcbufCfg 0 1 0 1
profileCfg 0 77 7 4.6 125.19 0 0 25.11 1 556 4649 0 0 30
chirpCfg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
frameCfg 0 0 4 0 10 1 0
lowPower 0 0
guiMonitor 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. The above parameters were derived from you mmwave sensing estimator 1.2. It has the number of adc samples set at 556 and the number of range fft bins at 1024. Is there any way to force the number of adc samples to be 1024 to achieve the maximum numerical processing gain? About another 6 db's in gain could be achieved by lowering the noise floor though sampling more data. I assume the software zero pads the remaining bins from 557 to 1024. I have tried to manual adjust the parameters to meet my constraints but I have not be very successful.
3. When I examined the configuration file generated by your demo visualizer gui configuration file for 1 transmitter and 1 receiver, the channel parameters specify receiver antenna to be "2" as indicated by channelCfg 2 1 0
Is there any particular reason for using one receiver antenna over another?
Thank you.
Al