This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BOOSTXL-PGA460: Powering large ultrasonic transducer?

Part Number: BOOSTXL-PGA460
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PGA460,

Hello,

I'm planning on using a PGA460 to drive a single transmitter in the development of a bistatic ultrasonic ranging system through solid ice.

The transducer signal should be powerful enough to be read by a sensor up to 13 meters away (a separate system) in roughly this configuration:

I'm planning on using a 40kHz ground sonar transducer like this one:

https://www.steminc.com/PZT/en/mini-bolt-clamped-langevin-transducer-40-khz-no-threaded-hole

The system runs on a collection of large 12V batteries in a remote, harsh environment.

All of the literature I've found about the PGA460 is about relatively low-power transducers and I wanted to check if there are any problems inherently in trying to drive a larger one. The lack of current limiting and tuning capabilities of most of the commercially available equipment (such as those powering ultrasonic cleaners) has left me seeking alternatives; plus, the development software alongside the BOOSTXL-PGA460 looks very helpful in the design stages.

I have not yet determined the exact power needed to transmit the signal, but a quick calculation gives the following (I don't expect to require close to the full 30W):

Resonant frequency = 40kHz +/-.7kHz

Resonant impedance =< 25 ohm


Any comments or would be highly appreciated - I am new to ultrasonics! Is there a more suitable product?

Many thanks,

Chris

  • Hi Chris,
    With respect to high power ultrasonic applications, the PGA460 is best option for driving an ultrasonic transducer.
    We have not used the PGA460 is this type of application, so I am unable to comment on the feasibility of this project, but I don't want to discourage you from trying.

    The Steminc SMBLTF40W30NH transducer you have identified calls for a maximum input voltage of 950Vpp.
    Considering your supply is at 12V, and most ultrasonic sensor center-tap transformers we use have a turns ratio of 1:1:10, the excitation voltage at the transducer will only be ~240Vpp (at most). I recommend that you start with this configuration. If the driver is too weak to be detected through 15m of ice, you may need to consider the following driver options:

    To increase the transducer excitation voltage close to the transducer's maximum of 950Vpp, you will need a different center-tap transformer (i.e. 1:1:40 turns ratio for ~960Vpp maximum at 12V CT) or use a pre-driver with the original transformer. The PGA460's OUTA/B pins are limited to a maximum of 30V, meaning the center-tap of the transformer cannot exceed 15V. To apply more than 15V at the center-tap of the transformer, you can use the PGA460's OUTA/B pins as predrivers for external FETs with a larger voltage rating. E.g., if you continued to use a transformer with a 1:1:10 turns ratio, you would need a center tap voltage of 47.5V. Your external low-side FETs should be rated with a Vds of 50V in this example. To see a schematic implementation of the pre-driver transformer mode, see the PGA460 Full-Bridge Driver Solutions for Ultrasonic Transducers AppNote ( www.ti.com/.../slaa780.pdf ). In short, you ill need to connect the transformer's primary outer windings to the drains of the low-side FETs, the gates to the OUTA/B predriver outputs, and the sources to ground.
  • Thank you for these excellent perspectives - I'm putting in an order now for a BOOSTXL-PGA460.
    I just want to clarify that this system does not use reflections at all, but rather has a moving receiver. Is this something that can be accounted for in the EVM GUI?
  • Hi Chris,
    The EVM hardware will support a pitch-and-catch implementation, but the GUI assumes a round-trip time-of-flight measurement.
    The time-of-flight readout will be correct, but the GUI's distance conversion will need to be doubled to account for a one-way measurement.
  • Chris,

    Hope Akeem's response helped with your question. I will close this thread for now. Please start a new thread if you have any further questions.