Hi
The position of the detected point cloud are defined with respect to the sensor. Since the sensor has the finite dimension, where is the origin defined exactly on the sensor?
Thanks!
Kai
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi
The position of the detected point cloud are defined with respect to the sensor. Since the sensor has the finite dimension, where is the origin defined exactly on the sensor?
Thanks!
Kai
Hi Kai,
The Point cloud is in reference to Antennas on the sensor.
Thanks
Yogesh
Hi Yogesh
Thanks for your quick reply.
I understand that the point cloud is defined with respect to antennas. Since the point cloud always has a coordinate of (x0,y0,z0), there must be a origin point. My question is that where is (0,0,0) defined.
Thanks!
Kai
Kai,
Roughly it is b'n rx antennas for far object.
Is your object near and are you trying to apply near field correction as mentioned in the attached guide?
Thanks
Yogesh
Hi Yogesh
I believe the calibration only helps get accurate position with respect to the sensor but has no impact on the origin.
From this image, the center of RX antennas only gives me the origin in the azimuth. How about the origin in the elevation?
Thanks!
Kai
Hi Kai,
Not sure if I understand, the accurate position with respect to sensor is origin itself. Am I missing anything here.
Thanks
Yogesh
HI Yogesh
The position of a target reported from the sensor is the relative coordinates defined in terms of sensor origin. The calibration procedure is able to provide accurate position with respect to sensor origin. But I still have no idea on where the origin is because what I am interested in is the global position of a target rather than the position with respect to the sensor origin. That is why I need to know where the origin is defined exactly. Hope this makes sense to you.
Thanks!
Kai
I am not sure what you mean by global position, everything is relative. Whatever you estimate is relative to the sensor, the sensor is the origin. The exact origin within the sensor span covered by the physical tx-rx antennas is not defined because of the far field assumption. You can imagine the origin as the entire rectangle on the sensor board which spans the physical tx-rx azimuth and elevation antennas.
Hi Piyush
By global position, I meant it is position defined with respect to somewhere else, e.g., one corner of the room, rather than the sensor. In this case, the global position is equal to the sum of the relative position vector + sensor origin vector. From your answer, it seems the global position I get will have the maximum error around the physical dimension of the antenna array since the exact origin on the sensor is not well defined. Am I correct?
Thanks!
Kai