Compiler/IWR1443BOOST: 70~80 Ghz Band are what more better than 60Ghz? ( using for Vital sensing)

jeamin cha

Prodigy 240 points

Part Number: IWR1443BOOST
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: IWR1443

Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler

70~80 Ghz Band are what more better than 60Ghz? ( using for Vital sensing)

We collection. "70~80 Ghz are what more better than 60Ghz?" Reason for Select iwr1443 chip.

So Can you tell me?, What more better than 60Ghz?

this is will include to a official report.

thank you.

over 5 years ago

0 Former Member over 5 years ago

Hello,

The appropriate band to use will largely depend on your regional regulations as well as application. Please see this for more details: https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/industrial_strength/archive/2018/11/07/leveraging-the-60-ghz-rf-band-for-intelligent-industrial-mmwave-sensing

Amanda

0 jeamin cha over 5 years ago in reply to Former Member

Prodigy 240 points

Um... I saw Your Answer and Research Text Article

But I think wrong answer.

My question "70~80 Ghz are what more better than 60Ghz? what advantage can you tell me?"

your answer "60ghz what more better than 24 ghz what advantage" this is not want

recheck please

0 Former Member over 5 years ago in reply to jeamin cha

As stated in the article I linked 77GHz is mainly only used if the application is automotive. Since you are interested in vital signs regulatory restrictions likely will make it so that 60GHz is more appropriate as detailed in the link.

Sensors

Sensors forum

Compiler/IWR1443BOOST: 70~80 Ghz Band are what more better than 60Ghz? ( using for Vital sensing)