This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

PGA900: Using P-Channel as universal differential input

Part Number: PGA900

I wan't to use the P-Channel of the PGA900 as universal differential input, in order to measure various sensors other than a resistive bridge e.g. in order to measure a Thermocouple I need to use the T-Channel for the cold-junction compensation, and the P-Channel to measure the Thermocouple.
As the P-Channel differential inputs need at least a 0,3V Common-Mode Offset (Datasheet: 7.3.9 P Gain) I already did experiments using a compensated High Impedance bridge and overlay the differential signal on the bridge output. Although this worked as a first test, it is no option for us.
Thus i wanted to ask, whether you already had a use case that had the same problem and now can suggest a solution that helps overcoming the Common-Mode Offset.

I wan't to use the P-Channel of the PGA900 as universal differential input, in order to measure various sensors other than a resistive bridge e.g. in order to measure a Thermocouple I need to use the T-Channel for the cold-junction compensation, and the P-Channel to measure the Thermocouple.
As the P-Channel differential inputs need a 0,3V Common-Mode Offset (7.3.9 P Gain) we already did experiments using a compensated High Impedance bridge and overlay the differential Signal on the bridge output. Although this worked as a first test, it is no option for us.
Thus i wanted to ask, whether you already had a use case that had the same problem and now can recommend a solution that helps overcoming the Common-Mode Offset.

  • Hi Raphael,

    You are correct about the common mode voltage requirement for the PGAIN inputs. You will have to use some method to pull up the common mode of your input signal externally. This will have to be done with some amount of passive components. A compensated bridge as you have tried is likely the most reliable solution. What is not feasible about using a bridge in your application?


    Regards,

  • Hi Scott,

    thank you for your reply.

    Our first thought was, that a bridge that needs to be calibrated/compensated would not be beneficial compared to a solution with a different ADC.

    However, i will take a closer look again at this solution.

    Kind regards

    Raphael