This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

IWR1642BOOST: Inaccuracy in the High Accuracy Lab

Part Number: IWR1642BOOST
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: IWR1642

Hi,

I am trying to assess the accuracy and precision of the IWR1642's range measurement in the High Accuracy Lab. My setup is shown below. I know the distance from the object (a copper penny) to the edge of the textbook is exactly 0.20 m, and I have used a tape measure to determine that the distance from the edge of the textbook to the sensor is about 0.10 m (+/- 0.001 m). Therefore the distance from sensor to object is about 0.30 m (+/- 0.001 m). I have found that the measurements reported on the GUI are consistently off by 0.07 to 0.08 m, reporting values of 0.37 to 0.38 m. This occurs even when I significantly restrict the last two values (minimum and maximum range) in the RangeLimitCfg to 0.20 and 0.40.  

The device is clearly very precise (the range measurement rarely varies by more than 1 mm). However, it is consistently inaccurate, and I am having trouble understanding why. I understand that there will always be a slight inaccuracy due to the crude setup, but 7-8 cm seems like an awful lot (especially given the title of the lab). 

Here is the configuration I am using:

sensorStop

flushCfg

dfeDataOutputMode 1

channelCfg 1 1 0

adcCfg 2 1

adcbufCfg 0 1 1 1

profileCfg 0 77 7 7 114.4 0 0  33.71 1 512 5000 0 0 48

chirpCfg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

frameCfg 0 0 10 0 500 1 0

lowPower 0 1

guiMonitor 1 1 0 0 0 1

RangeLimitCfg 2 1 0.20 0.40

sensorStart

Here is the setup:

 

Regards,

Josh

  • Hi Josh,

    Please refer to this link for offset issue:

    e2e.ti.com/.../699928

    Regards,
    Michelle
  • Hi Michelle,

    Thank you, that is good to know. I ran the calibration procedure described in the "Range Bias and Rx Channel Gain/Offset Measurement and Compensation" section of the doxygen. I got the following results:

    As you can see, I am getting multiple results for the range bias of the sensor, and it is updating continuously. When I restart the program and ran the configuration file again, I got even more different results:

    This is making it difficult to follow Step 5: "The command printed out on the CLI now can be copied and pasted in any configuration file for correction purposes"--since there are multiple commands being printed, I'm not sure which one is correct.

    Is this perhaps because I am using a copper penny as my object, rather than something like a corner reflector?  If not, how else can I correct this?

    Regards,

    Josh

  • Josh,

    A copper penny is not an ideal object to use for calibration. Such small area is hard to get a stable result even with zoom-in lens. Corner reflector is a good one but if it is not available, a metal plate could be as good.

    Thanks and Regards,
    Michelle