This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMUX1575: .s6p s-parameter files

Part Number: TMUX1575
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX646

Hello,

I am looking for the .s6p S-parameter files for the TMUX1575 for some C-Phy simulations.

The TI website currently only has s4p files which don’t work for C-Phy.

Do we have any .s6p S-parameter files for the TMUX1575?

Thanks
Austin Allen

  • Hello Austin,

    So we do not have any sp6 file for the TMUX1575. However we can try to better understand  your use case and evaluate if the tmux1575 is good for your application.

    1.My first question is what is the Gigasymbols per second (Gsps) for your C-phy application?  This question answer will help us determine the 1575 performance in your application.

    For example lets say your application had 1.8 Gsps.  

    According to  my understanding iC-PHY encodes packets at a rate of 2.28 bits/symbols. So if  you are trying to get 1.8Gsps Symbols per second then you would need to support approximately 1.8G/2.28 = 800MHz. per signal path of the mux.
    The TMUX1575 can support up to 1.8GHz, which should be able to support C-PHY if that was your application speed.

    Finally the TMUX646 states on its datasheet it can support C-Phy applications and has example on it.

    Please let me know what you think and I am happy to help in any way needed.

    Regards,

    Kameron

  • Hi Kameron, 

    Appreciate the guidance here. We are looking for the sp6 file in order to do an apples-to-apples comparison on TMUX1575 and its specific loss compared to other muxes on the market with sp6 files. Is there any plan for us to roll out a sp6 file?

    Best,

    Austin Allen

  • Hello Austin,

    Thanks for your message back. Let me align with the rest of the mux team on this topic.

    In the meantime, Can you tell me the competitor part that is being evaluated?( This will help our team better tackle this topic)

    Regards,

    Kameron

  • Hello Austin,

    I will close this thread and our team and yourself will continue to align offline.