This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMUX6234: TMUX6234 Configuration for Differential Signal Switching – Clarification Needed

Part Number: TMUX6234

Tool/software:

Subject: TMUX6234 Configuration for Differential Signal Switching – Clarification Needed

Hi TI Team,

I’m planning to use the TMUX6234 to route differential signal pairs, and I’d like to clarify the truth table behaviour based on the application I'm designing.

Use Case: (example)

I have 4 pairs of differential input signals, and I intend to switch two pairs to the outputs (D1 and D2) at a time. Here's the required configuration:

  • A1+ → S1A → D1

  • A1− → S2A → D2

  • B1+ → S1B → D1

  • B1− → S2B → D2

Objective:

I want to configure the device such that either:

  • (A1+, A1−) pair or

  • (B1+, B1−) pair
    is routed to the D1 and D2 outputs (i.e., two inputs to two outputs simultaneously).

Concern:

After analyzing the truth table from the datasheet (refer to attached image), it appears that only one source pin can be connected to a drain pin at a time. For example:

  • When SEL1 = 0, S1B is connected to D1 (but not S1A).

  • When SEL1 = 1, S1A is connected to D1 (but not S1B).

Thus, it seems we cannot simultaneously connect both S1A and S2A (or S1B and S2B) to D1 and D2 for differential routing as intended.

Request:

Could you please confirm if there's a way to configure TMUX6234 to support two differential pairs switching simultaneously, or would this require a different multiplexer configuration?

Thanks in advance for your guidance.

Best regards,
Manikandan V

  • Hello Manikandan,

    If you set SEL1 and SEL2 to 0, then SB1 and SB2 will be connected to D1 and D2 respectively.
    SEL1 and SEL2 can be set to 1 to connected the A channels instead.  

    I see the tables seems to be misleading but you can have all four channels active at the same time.

    Thanks,

    Nir