This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TS3A24159: signal attenuation

Part Number: TS3A24159
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74CBTLV3257, TMUX1574, TMUX1575

Hi,

Customer is using TS3A24159. Signal is1Mhz, 220mV. but after MUX, it's only 160mV.

why? is the 0.3Ω ON-state resistance's reason?

thank you!

Best regards,

Yuan

  • Hi Yuan,

    What is the load impedance that the Mux is feeding into? 

    Ron will attenuate the signal, but how much depends on the loading conditions.

    Please let me know, so I can look into this a little more, my first instinct is that it seems like a large voltage drop, but I can' t be sure until I know the loading conditions. 

    Best,

    Parker Dodson

  • Hi Parker,

    here is the load's spec:

    center frequency(MHz): 1.0±0.1

    R0 under IMhz:100~500Ω

    electrostatic capacity: 1200pf±20%

    customer used to chose SN74CBTLV3257, didn't meet this kind of attenuation. but considering to size, they picked TS3A24159.

    thank you!

    Best regards,

    Yuan

  • Hi Yuan,

    Could you confirm the voltage drop across the switch, I understand that the load voltage is 160mV, but the level of attenuation seems way too high for this part with the indicated loading conditions that you mentioned.

    Can you also confirm what supply rails are being used and the temperature that the system is supposed to operate in? 

    Also is there anything else in the signal pathway that can attenuate the signal besides the mux? 

    Please let me know so we can get to the bottom of this issue!

    Best,

    Parker Dodson

  • Below reply is from customer.

    1. Confirm that the pressure drop at both ends of the switch is 60mV;

    2. The whole test environment is from 15℃ to 20℃;

    3. There are devices affecting amplitude attenuation in the whole link, but my question is why the amplitude attenuation of the cover switch is so large;

    4. The circuit diagram I tested is as follows:

    Working condition 1: The signal amplitude tested by the switch is 160mV

    Working condition 2: When the signal switch is not used, the amplitude tested under the same conditions is 220mV

    5. When SN74CBTLV3257 is used, there is no signal attenuation. Could you recommend a dual-channel signal switch with smaller package with similar performance to SN74? Thanks.

  • Hi Yuan,

    Parker is out of office today, but I can certainly recommend a replacement to SN74CBTLV3257 in the meantime.

    Take a look at TMUX1574 and TMUX1575. These are available in smaller package options (SOT-23 THN and WCSP, respectively) and offer improved performance.

    Best regards,
    Kate